![]() |
|
|
|||
watch question
On the NFHS 2025 exam, this is a question:
The umpire notices that B3 is wearing a smartwatch. When the coach calls out the signal to the batter, B3 looks at the smartwatch and then steps into the batter's box. What is the correct ruling? The “correct” test answer is: B3 is using an electronic device to receive communication from the coach outside of the dugout. B3 is ejected unless the umpire deems it to be of a minor nature. I disagree. I believe we have always taught and practiced that rulings are based on facts, not mind-reading or suspicion. If the coach “calls out the signal”, that is not electronic. If the batter is using the smartwatch like a play card, or checking wind speed or watching her 10 second limit; that is not receiving a signal. Wearing a smartwatch is not a violation, even in another test question. Comments, please.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Watch | tomes1978 | Football | 1 | Mon Aug 23, 2010 08:48pm |
A watch for the 40/25? | MJT | Football | 12 | Mon Aug 25, 2008 02:57pm |
Need a new watch | Texas Aggie | Football | 9 | Wed Apr 30, 2008 05:40pm |
watch to the end | cmathews | Football | 4 | Thu Feb 22, 2007 05:51pm |
Hey, watch #24 for. . . . | mplagrow | Basketball | 87 | Sat Jan 14, 2006 01:58am |