![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Staying true to the OP and without introducing confusing additions, here is what some of my local guys believe.
There is no rule support for calling the batter out should he throw his bat in anger. It may be a moot point if the batter was retired. The ball remains live until play has been completed. It is umpire judgment as to whether to eject the player or not. Local bylaws aside, a team would need to replace the ejected player with a legal substitute. If there were no subs available, the game would be declared a forfeit. The team whose batter was called out for throwing the bat would have a legitimate reason to protest the game. If anyone has differing opinions, please provide appropriate citations. This action relates to USA Softball. Other sanctions similar?
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
|
I believe ejections do not take effect until after playing action.
I don't know any rule for a player being out for bat throwing, except if it interferes with the defense making a play. Let's not judge each other's posts. Either ask for clarification or ignore.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Throwing The Bat | Fritz | Baseball | 4 | Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:18pm |
| Throwing the Bat - LL | MD Longhorn | Baseball | 67 | Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:45am |
| Throwing the Bat | Stair-Climber | Softball | 8 | Tue May 31, 2005 11:05am |
| Throwing off the ref? | Oz Referee | Basketball | 3 | Sun May 27, 2001 12:29pm |
| NOT Throwing a "T" | rainmaker | Basketball | 2 | Fri Feb 16, 2001 01:28pm |