![]() |
|
|||
Game Management Opinion
Please consider this play:
Play: With R1 on 1B, B2 has a 2-1 count. The next pitch is a ball and B2, thinking it is ball 4 heads to 1B and R1 advances to 2B. The plate umpire states that was only ball 3, so B2 comes back to bat with a 3-1 count. What happens to R1? Ruling: In this play the offensive and defense have the responsibility to know the count. When R1 advanced to 2B the ball remains live as if they were stealing. B2 would be returned to bat and R1 would remain on 2B. What do you think of the following comment versus allowing the play? However this is a great preventative umpire situation. When the plate umpire sees B2 start to 1B, call time and now nothing can happen and we will have less of a problem than if we had allowed the play to continue.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
game management | CecilOne | Softball | 17 | Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:10am |
Game management? | AremRed | Basketball | 23 | Wed Mar 06, 2013 08:58am |
End of game management - Got to be a better way | Back In The Saddle | Basketball | 24 | Tue Dec 21, 2004 02:25pm |
End of game management | BamaRef | Basketball | 24 | Thu Nov 18, 2004 03:31pm |