|
Fri Nov 10, 2017, 03:26pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is a runner who did not retouch 2nd while returning to 1st and was called out on appeal. The last time by concept would be if in the same situation the runner had returned to 1st without retouching 2nd, then advanced back to 2nd on the overthrow, touching 2nd on the advance after overthrow would correct the error of not touching it while initially returning to 1st.
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" | teebob21 | Softball | 15 | Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| Are officials allowed to "guess" the amount of time to put on the clock? | All_Heart | Basketball | 1 | Mon Nov 30, 2009 09:30am |
| Softball in "News of the Weird" | SC Ump | Softball | 1 | Tue Apr 15, 2008 09:49pm |
Threaded Mode
