|
Wed Nov 08, 2017, 11:46am
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMO, the "last time by" concept contradicts the requirement to touch bases in the proper order. If one must touch first, second, third, then return order must third, second, first. If one must retreat to first and misses second, the only way to remedy would be to go back to touch second, AND THEN go back to first again; only after retouching ALL in the proper order could one again advance to second and be safe there.
At least, that's how I learned it; and the case plays in all these posts above seem to lean in that direction.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" | teebob21 | Softball | 15 | Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| Are officials allowed to "guess" the amount of time to put on the clock? | All_Heart | Basketball | 1 | Mon Nov 30, 2009 09:30am |
| Softball in "News of the Weird" | SC Ump | Softball | 1 | Tue Apr 15, 2008 09:49pm |
Threaded Mode
