![]() |
|
|||
NFHS Foul Ball
After a batter fouls a pitch back to the backstop, retrieved by the catcher, must the catcher return this directly back to the pitcher? Or can she throw to another player who then returns the ball to the pitcher.?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
I don't think it does. It's a foul ball; there are no possible plays that can be made on runners. So a throw to third base would violate the rule.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
NFHS rule certainly needs to be revisited. Applying common sense to this foul ball situation would lead one to say the ball is essentially 'dead' and nothing can happen until the ball is put back in play.
NCAA describes this perfectly: The catcher must return the ball directly to the pitcher after a foul tip and each pitch not contacted. Exceptions: 1. To play on a base runner. 2. When the batter becomes a base runner. 3. After a strikeout. 4. After a putout or an attempted putout made by the catcher. 5. When a checked swing is appealed on a third strike. 6. When the batter is not entitled to first base but runs anyway. 7. An errant throw intended for the pitcher. |
|
|||
And I would counter that the NCAA rule is flawed in that a pitch the catcher fields on a short hop and then throws the ball to the third baseman would be nothing if the batter swung and nicked it (foul ball), but would be an extra ball on the batter if she didn't contact it.
Quite frankly, I don't care for the rule altogether. Who cares that the catcher threw the ball to another fielder who then, in turn, throws it to the pitcher? As long as there isn't a delay in the pitcher being ready to deliver the next pitch, no biggie. Charge an extra ball to the batter if the catcher's throw to another fielder is wild, gets muffed by that fielder, or that fielder's subsequent throw to the pitcher causes a delay.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
You may want to re-read that rule 6-7.B. Pay particular attention to the EXCEPTION (does not apply with a runner on base). The catcher can throw to any base without making a play as long as a runner is on base.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Quote:
In today's female game, there would be another team meeting with high fives and hand slaps, after every foul ball, just like the start of every inning, and the end of every request for time by a defensive player. There is no reason to invite more stoppages; allowing that throw to someone other than the pitcher, and to start the next pitch sequence, would be an open invitation to more "huddles" that aren't conferences. Since we have so few tools available to keep the game under 2 hours, anymore, I would be really unhappy if that rule was removed (and we couldn't begin a reasonable timing sequence between pitches).
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
Does that exception also apply in FED play? I couldn't find it in the rule, but the case plays only address situations with no base runners.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
I was very glad when that rule was put in, not sure exactly what year it was. I agree, we don't need any more artificial delays. In the time that I've been umpiring, I think I called a ball for this violation only once.
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dead ball foul or live ball foul | johnsonboys03 | Basketball | 11 | Wed Dec 05, 2012 02:34pm |
Live ball foul administered as a dead ball foul | ML99 | Football | 2 | Sun Nov 01, 2009 08:38am |
Dead ball foul, then live ball foul? | stegenref | Football | 13 | Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:47pm |
NFHS Dead Ball Foul after TD | FredFan7 | Football | 2 | Wed Aug 03, 2005 10:36am |
Foul Ball Out or Dead Ball/Foul Ball | Frank Drebin | Baseball | 1 | Sat Apr 30, 2005 06:50am |