![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Out of curiosity, why didn't the umpire go ON HIS OWN?
Yet another example of not preventing a problem. Those who "think" the know what "preventative officiating" is tend to understand the concept the least.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
|
Why would he go if he already judged there was no swing? Are you suggesting the PU go every time the batter brings the bat forward?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
The PU should go for help on any "checked" swing ruled a ball, even without being asked, any time the PLATE UMPIRE believes there may be an issue from being unsure; agreed.
The OP never suggested any doubt by the PU. Absent that, no reason to go. We don't answer prayers; just reasonable requests supported by rule. There's a higher authority (many believe) that answers prayers.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
|
That's an asinine conclusion not supported at all by what I said. If there is actual doubt, go for help. Don't wait for a shit storm.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
|
And where did the OP indicate there was any doubt? For that matter, where did your response indicate "any doubt" as being a condition of your comment?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
Honestly, I read your comment the same way he did.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|