The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Soccer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 01, 2012, 10:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
NFHS vs USSF: Goal Being Scored

In the NFHS soccer rule book, it states Rules 1.4.1 Situation D: During play, a goal gets moved back off the goal line (away from the field), and the entire ball passes beyond the goal line, but does not pass beyond the goal posts and under the cross bar because the goal is not in its proper position. A goal is awarded. Ruling: Correct decision. The goal shall be assumed to be in the proper position.

That seems pretty clear to me, that the LINE is the basis for the goal to be judged.

However, in USSF, Law 10 states Referees should signal a goal only when it is absolutely clear that the ball has wholly crossed the goal line, beneath the crossbar and between the goal posts.

I haven't seen any ATR's or Position Papers that states anything differently, unless I overlooked them. So is the below comment a fair assessment?

If both elements (goal and line) are present, you have to adhere to the Law. So if the goal happens to be a foot in front of the line, and the ball crosses over the plane of the goal posts and crossbar but NOT over the line, it can't be a goal. The same goes for the opposite. If the goal is a foot behind the line and the ball completely crosses the line but not completely through the posts and crossbar, it's NOT a goal.

If a line isn't present, then you the Law applies to the goal only and vice versa if there is a line and no goal.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 02, 2012, 11:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
I think you're trying to read too much into it.

The point of the wording of the rule is not to imply what you seem to be thinking but simply to say that crossing the goal line 20' away from the goal or 15 feet above the goal is not a goal. It takes more than crossing the line to be a goal. It must cross the line into the goal itself. But it also doesn't assume some odd situation where the goal has been displaced. It assumes the normal placement of the goal.

Read it like this **underlined and italicized words added by me**... Referees should signal a goal only when it is absolutely clear that the ball has wholly crossed the goal line, beneath the level of the crossbar and between the lines of the goal posts..
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association

Last edited by Camron Rust; Wed Nov 07, 2012 at 12:36pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 02, 2012, 11:55am
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
All you need to know is...

Quote:
The goal shall be assumed to be in the proper position.
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 02, 2012, 06:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post
All you need to know is...
For all levels/associations of soccer?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 07, 2012, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by phatneff View Post
For all levels/associations of soccer?
I would think yes.

Again, most rules are not written with the consideration that a 1 in a million scenario might occur.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 07, 2012, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I would think yes.

Again, most rules are not written with the consideration that a 1 in a million scenario might occur.
Well, Cameron, perhaps some of the case plays are

But, yes, in this case common sense if nothing else, prevails. The goal line is clearly marked, as a referee, we know where the goal SHOULD be....If the ball crosses the goal line completely over an area in which the goal SHOULD be stationed, count the goal -- regardless of FIFA or NFHS level game.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differences of USSF and NFHS representing Soccer 2 Wed Oct 03, 2012 06:48am
Shifting gears, NFHS/USSF bainsey Soccer 21 Wed Sep 19, 2012 02:03pm
Time out after scored goal bigdog5142 Basketball 10 Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:38am
NFHS or USSF Officials hoopsaddict Soccer 8 Tue Aug 31, 2010 03:22pm
Hand Ball, goal scored, Red Card? hbioteach Soccer 13 Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1