The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Soccer
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 2.33 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 26, 2007, 10:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
If the mask conforms to the rule of
"A protective face mask may be worn by a player with a facial injury. The mask may be made of hard material, but must be worn molded to the face with no protrusions. A medical release for the injured player signed by a physician (MD/DO) shall be available at the game site." then why does someone have to add a non-rule non-documented provision of being custom made?

The issues are really medical authorization for an injury and having no protrusions.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 09:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
False. All of the above of the rule can be affirmed, but for a different player than for who was wearing it. For example, let's say I'm a freshman, and I break my nose. Well, last year as a senior, my brother broke his nose and had to wear the face mask that was designed specifically for him. He was 50 pounds heavier than I am now, so his face is bigger and wider. Although my doctor prescribed the face mask, and has a note for it, my parents don't want to pay for another one since we already have one from last year's injury to my brother. So, I can wear that one, right?? WRONG. Well, why not?? It fits all of the criteria of the rule, doesn't it? Yes, but not to the "verbal amendment" because the one for my brother may be too large for me and does not give any protection to me as one designed specifically for me. That is the reason for the "verbal amendment."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 11:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by phatneff
False. All of the above of the rule can be affirmed, but for a different player than for who was wearing it. For example, let's say I'm a freshman, and I break my nose. Well, last year as a senior, my brother broke his nose and had to wear the face mask that was designed specifically for him. He was 50 pounds heavier than I am now, so his face is bigger and wider. Although my doctor prescribed the face mask, and has a note for it, my parents don't want to pay for another one since we already have one from last year's injury to my brother. So, I can wear that one, right?? WRONG. Well, why not?? It fits all of the criteria of the rule, doesn't it? Yes, but not to the "verbal amendment" because the one for my brother may be too large for me and does not give any protection to me as one designed specifically for me. That is the reason for the "verbal amendment."
molded to the face with no protrusions
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
molded to the face with no protrusions
there aren't going to be any protrusions if it was molded to the face of my brother, either.

anyway, it's semantics. apparently, state associations felt that clarification needed to be made, so they did. if your state didn't make that clarification, congratulations!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,955
OK -- let me back track. I meant to say that it had to have no protrusions.... not that it had to be custom made for that particular kid. Nowhere will you find that written and no one with common sense is going to insist that it has to be. No protrusions and a written doctor's (MD, DO) medical authorization with them. That makes it legal.
__________________
That's my whistle -- and I'm sticking to it!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 08:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Just a question, but how would a referee know for which individual a mask was specifically made? What steps would be required to check?

It seems to me that such a decision by any state association would be unenforceable.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2007, 09:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Just a question, but how would a referee know for which individual a mask was specifically made? What steps would be required to check?

It seems to me that such a decision by any state association would be unenforceable.
_____________________

You couldn't - and it is.
__________________
That's my whistle -- and I'm sticking to it!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 28, 2007, 08:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to phatneff Send a message via Yahoo to phatneff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Just a question, but how would a referee know for which individual a mask was specifically made? What steps would be required to check?

It seems to me that such a decision by any state association would be unenforceable.
You tell us. You're the expert.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 09, 2007, 12:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
The following is from the NFHS website released 2/2/06

Rule 4-2-8 was added so that players who have incurred facial injuries can continue to play without fear of re-injury. This rule was made possible as a result of new technology in protective face masks. "The new masks are molded to the face with no protrusions, providing no additional risks to the player or opponents, and are legal with the appropriate medical sign-offs," said Bob Lombardi, chair of the NFHS Soccer Rules Committee and associate executive director of the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association. According to Lombardi, this new rule will also prevent players with facial injuries from continuing to play with no protection.

RE: "...The new masks are molded to the face..." This, to my interpretation implies that the "mask" is a CUSTOM FIT,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken Net... Scatmaster Basketball 4 Mon Feb 12, 2007 04:11pm
Nose to Nose iref4him Basketball 25 Thu Feb 08, 2007 05:59am
End of Game, Nose Swats at Snap duckdr` Football 52 Fri Oct 29, 2004 04:31pm
Wearing nose-protecting face gear JeffTheRef Basketball 3 Wed Dec 17, 2003 11:13am
broken stick Tom Grady Lacrosse 2 Sun May 12, 2002 10:04pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1