Forum: Lacrosse
Wed Jun 02, 2004, 02:42pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
LaxRef,
You are correct (as usual). The part...
LaxRef,
You are correct (as usual). The part about non time-serving WOULD include crease violations. So, you have made a good point. Given this fact, however, you might conclude that GK...
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Wed Jun 02, 2004, 01:24pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
LaxRef,
I"m sorry for not being clear. I...
LaxRef,
I"m sorry for not being clear. I meant a defender standing in the goal crease but not acting as the designated goalkeeper (no throat or chest protector, and no GK crosse). If you can't get...
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Wed Jun 02, 2004, 12:58pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
Rilax wrote in reference to a crease violation...
Rilax wrote in reference to a crease violation while the GK has possession:
It is just a play-on. If the player with the ball fails to complete a pass or run out of the crease it is just awarded...
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Wed Jun 02, 2004, 12:31pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
One addition
I have to make an addendum to my response:
LaxRef wrote:
If there's a crease violation with no possession, it's a play-on and possession at the spot or 20 yards laterally from the goal.
I...
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Wed Jun 02, 2004, 12:06pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Tue Jun 01, 2004, 10:09pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
|
Forum: Lacrosse
Tue Jun 01, 2004, 02:03pm
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4,507
|