|
Fri May 15, 2015, 10:25am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then we need an editorial change in the CASE BOOK and the Rule 9-2-3d already says "Contact an eligible receiver who is no longer a potential blocker." It does not say contact with only hands, it says CONTACT!!!
. . A defensive player shall not: a. Use a technique that is not permissible by rule. (See 2-3-2, 4) b. Use his hands to add momentum to the charge of a teammate who is on the line of scrimmage. c. Use his hands or arms to hook, lock, clamp, grasp, encircle or hold in an effort to restrain an opponent other than the runner. d. Contact an eligible receiver who is no longer a potential blocker. However, if the receiver is not attempting to block or has gone past or is moving away, it is illegal for the defender to use hands or body in the manner described. In this situation, it is clear that A1 is no longer a potential blocker on B1. (2-3-5a; 7-5-7)
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight Last edited by bigjohn; Fri May 15, 2015 at 10:41am. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Illegal Use of Hands | ballgame99 | Basketball | 28 | Fri Feb 15, 2013 08:51am |
| Illegal Use of the Hands | Suudy | Football | 16 | Fri Sep 01, 2006 01:02pm |
| DPI or Illegal use of the hands? | Suudy | Football | 4 | Fri Nov 04, 2005 07:08am |
| Illegal Use of the Hands | Suudy | Football | 16 | Sat Oct 01, 2005 01:00pm |
| Illegal use of hands or nothing? | Newbie Scott | Football | 3 | Thu Sep 04, 2003 05:25pm |
Threaded Mode
