|
|||
Illegal Use of the Hands
This seems to come up every year, and it never seems to be resolved. We argue every year on whether this is a foul.
Tight-end A80 is dragging across the field behind the defense as A7 drops back to pass. B51, seeing A80 dragging, hits A80 and knocks him down. After A80 is knocked down, A7 throws an incomplete pass at A80. The question is the contact by B51 an illegal use of the hands. Rule 9.2.3d says that a "defensive player shall not d. Contact an eligible receiver who is no longer a potential blocker." I think in this case it is obvious that A80 is on a pass route, and that the contact by B51 is illegal use of the hands. Others argue that if the hit was legal (i.e. in the front and not flagrant or punishing), then it is not a foul. How do you interpret the "no longer a potential blocker" phrase? Note: NFHS rule listed (9.2.3) Last edited by Suudy; Thu Aug 31, 2006 at 05:34pm. |
|
|||
If the passer has obviously dropped back to pass and the receiver obviously is not trying to contact the defender but is attempting to move away from him, it's an easy call for me.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Disagree. Until a forward pass that crosses the LOS is thrown, the end is a potential blocker. A screen pass, a swing pass, or a QB draw could be run--- to name a few. The "no longer a potential blocker" relates to the pass being thrown another direction and the end being out of the play. If he is blocked after the pass is thrown in his direction, it is DPI.
|
|
|||
Quote:
This is illegal use of hands for sure, and if ball is in the air, DPI. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
The key on this play is B51's position in relation to A7. If A7 is even with or behind B51, then it's illegal use of the hands. However, if A7 is between B51 and the line of scrimmage, he's fair game as B51 has a right to move up to make the play and clear out anyone who gets in his way. B51 is not sure if A7is a potential blocker or a potential receiver until he tips his hand by moving by of cutting away from B51. I'd have to see this play but I'd give B51 maybe a little more slack than some of the other posts might suggest.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson |
|
|||
But Jim, the post said he is running a drag route. That means is is off the LOS, has made a cut, and is running parellel to the LOS. If he gets knocked off and the QB has the ball looking to pass, we have a foul. Now if the QB is running the option or has handed off, that is another matter. If A has a running play going on, A80 will not be running a pass route, he will be blocking.
Niner makes it sound as if the pass is not in the air, you can do anything to the receiver and it is fine. That is absolutely wrong and you will get crucified by an offensive coach if you do that. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson |
|
|||
Exactly as I see it. I have this same argument every year with one of the WH in our association. I've learned that if I call this when I'm working with him, he'll wave it off and chew me out. As for the other WHs, I'll continue to call it.
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPI or Illegal use of the hands? | Suudy | Football | 4 | Fri Nov 04, 2005 07:08am |
Illegal Use of the Hands | Suudy | Football | 16 | Sat Oct 01, 2005 01:00pm |
illegal hands to the face | cippy | Football | 1 | Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:57am |
Illegal use of hands or nothing? | Newbie Scott | Football | 3 | Thu Sep 04, 2003 05:25pm |
illegal hands and possession | pitlord | Football | 5 | Tue Oct 22, 2002 09:55pm |