|
|||||
Quote:
Again, show me anywhere that a stiff arm is considered illegal? One reference please, just one. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Do you expect the term "stiff arm" to automatically refer to a head hit? To me it just means fending off an opponent by contact using an open palm and a locked elbow. Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Respondint to your question, if the left guard, or any player, had possession of the ball he would be a "runner" (NFHS: 2-32-13) and subject to any and all restrictions and/or allowances of any other player meeting the requirements of a "runner". |
|
|||
Well, gee, thanks, Tautology Man. Should we get confirmation from the Commissioner of the Obvious?
|
|
|||
Sometimes the most appropriate answer to a silly question, is a silly answer
|
|
|||
And honestly, all of this discussion is silly when you are trying to create a situation to be illegal that has never been addressed as a problem (by any level).
But welcome to the world of the internet. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
I think what Robert is trying to describe (and is potentially demonstrated by the LT in the YouTube video) is a punch and that has always been illegal. A punch and targeting are two very different things. If the action by the runner is not a punch or facemask then it's not a foul. I thoroughly expect the rule/philosophy of the NFHS targeting will be very similar to the NCAA rule.
|
|
|||
What I meant to describe includes punches, but is not encompassed by them. I meant any sort of hit that is outside what is useful to producing tactical football advantage. The way the quoted person describes "targeting" upthread looks like exactly the same concept. But that concept has always been there, as long as there's been a rule against unnecessary roughness. It goes way back to before Fed & NCAA had their own rules.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/97263-new-fed-rules-up.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
Going to fast soon to be a penalty? | CoachHuey.com | This thread | Refback | Thu Feb 13, 2014 04:36pm | |
Going to fast soon to be a penalty? | CoachHuey.com | This thread | Refback | Thu Feb 13, 2014 02:42pm | |
Going to fast soon to be a penalty? | CoachHuey.com | This thread | Refback | Thu Feb 13, 2014 02:40pm |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When a defender fails to conform to guarding rules, do you apply screening rules? | MiamiWadeCounty | Basketball | 3 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 09:55pm |
ASA Rules Approved by Playing Rules Committee | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 2 | Wed Nov 09, 2011 03:18pm |
NFHS Rules Interpreters versus IAABO Rules Interpreters | dpicard | Basketball | 7 | Mon Dec 07, 2009 01:13pm |
There are no rules and those are the rules. NCAA | JeffTheRef | Basketball | 6 | Sat Feb 07, 2004 11:01pm |