Is the NFL ever going to use logic with its replay rules?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by hbk314

Nobody's really given me a good reason as to why it shouldn't be.

Well that is subjective right? It does not mean you have accepted the reasons, which in fact are true.

Peace

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well that is subjective right? It does not mean you have accepted the reasons, which in fact are true.

Peace

Doesn't make them good reasons.

Are you honestly telling me you don't think that play should be reviewable?

[Raymond]

No one here works for the NFL, so your complaints will never be satisfied here. Try Tweeting Blandino.

Tomlin should have challenged that Clark was down by contact, that is reviewable.

Why aren't balls and strikes reviewable?

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

No one here works for the NFL, so your complaints will never be satisfied here. Try Tweeting Blandino.

Tomlin should have challenged that Clark was down by contact, that is reviewable.

Why aren't balls and strikes reviewable?

No. That wouldn't have been reviewable since the officials ruled he didn't have possession.