![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
|
|||
I don't think this was an issue of measuring vs. not measuring. The 46 was the line to gain and the ball was obviously placed well short of the 46. There was no reason to stop the clock to measure. The reason to stop the clock was to correct the H and put the chains back where they belong based on the spot. I do question the spot since the L appeared to have the 46 but ceded to the H for some reason.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Bengals' BenJarvus Green-Ellis Scores Controversial TD Against Colts | Bleacher Report
Triplette's on a roll. |
|
|||
I watched several replays and could not tell if the NT made contact. It looks very possible he tripped on his own which means the reversal was correct. If Triplett did not look at the possible early contact then he may be in a bit of trouble. Per the pool report transcript he only looked at the goal line.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Cincinnati Bengals vs. Indianapolis Colts Pool Report |
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Doubt he's even a baseball umpire either. He's never once posted in the Baseball forum concerning a situation he was involved in.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not here mindlessly bashing. I'm commenting on plays as I see them from a non-official's point of view, and I'm getting an official's point of view in response. That's why I post here. Obviously the people on this forum are going to have a better understanding of why things are called the way they are, or the rules that come into play in certain situations, than some idiot on a fan forum or ESPN comment page. I'm not sure what the problem is with saying a call is wrong when it's wrong. Is there a reason I can't offer my opinion on a play when bringing it up for discussion? |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
The issue here is the potential contact was not at the goal line but back at the 4/5 when he was tripped. That is the contact that was ruled to have put the runner down, but Triplett didn't look at that part of the play to determine if there was contact. I don't think it's conclusive so the call on the field should have stood.
|
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
There was probably a better way to put it, but there have been several high-profile mistakes (or perceived mistakes) in primetime games in the last few weeks. And to be fair, it's hard to imagine a more embarrassing chain of events than Sunday night.
|
|
|||
Most of us have learned long ago, no matter how hard you suck on a whistle, that damn "tweet" is NEVER coming back. All it takes is an instant of distraction or loss of focus to create a mistake. What matters then, is how well we deal with our mistake.
Most on-field mistakes generate a little scar tissue we carry forward FOREVER to help prevent us from repeating the mistake. Other than that memory, there's little else of value to bother carrying forward, so the smart thing to do, is reset your focus and concentration and snap the ball for the next play. Next week you'll have another opportunity to work your FIRST perfect game. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Giants game obstruction | Forest Ump | Baseball | 11 | Tue Oct 23, 2012 01:34pm |
Redskins - Giants | BktBallRef | Football | 7 | Wed Sep 16, 2009 07:28pm |
Obstruction in Giants/Phillies game | Toadman15241 | Baseball | 10 | Tue May 08, 2007 07:47am |
MLB obstruction rule -- Giants vs. Cards game | Tap | Softball | 4 | Thu Oct 17, 2002 08:02pm |
Giants - Redskins | PeteBooth | Football | 2 | Thu Jan 11, 2001 05:05pm |