First touching/ IW

[maven]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

The times when we replay the down include any time where it's not clear who was disadvantaged by the IW - including most COP and loose ball plays. Given that on this play you do not know which team was disadvantaged by the early killing of the play, I'd go with replaying the down.

As a general principle, that's pretty good. But in case of an accepted penalty, nobody's disadvantaged by the IW, which by your principle explains why we go with the penalty (so far so good!).

But if we treat first touching as akin to a penalty, that would still permit us to negate the IW, and for the same reason, right?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by maven

As a general principle, that's pretty good. But in case of an accepted penalty, nobody's disadvantaged by the IW, which by your principle explains why we go with the penalty (so far so good!).

But if we treat first touching as akin to a penalty, that would still permit us to negate the IW, and for the same reason, right?

No, I don't think so.

With the penalty, everything that happens afterward ends up being disregarded anyway. (If the penalty is declined, you're back to replaying due to the IW)

With first touching, you have no idea whether the "zero yard penalty" will be accepted.

I suppose a "fair" way of navigating this would be to let the receiving team decide if they want to accept the first touching, or replay the down. I can see both sides of this.

[maven]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

I suppose a "fair" way of navigating this would be to let the receiving team decide if they want to accept the first touching, or replay the down. I can see both sides of this.

Originally Posted by CT1

I'd give R a choice -- take the ball at the FT spot, or rekick.

I smell developing consensus!

Somebody call NFHS...

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

No, I don't think so.

With the penalty, everything that happens afterward ends up being disregarded anyway. (If the penalty is declined, you're back to replaying due to the IW)

With first touching, you have no idea whether the "zero yard penalty" will be accepted.

I suppose a "fair" way of navigating this would be to let the receiving team decide if they want to accept the first touching, or replay the down. I can see both sides of this.

Sometimes the choice would be obvious. If K first touches their free kick in the neutral zone, what is to be gained by R in replaying the down, assuming rational decisions by both sides?

OK, I suppose if K's kicker is really, really weak and has trouble getting the ball to go any distance at all, R might decline a spot of touching by K 9 yards into the NZ in the hope that his next kick won't even go that far.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

Sometimes the choice would be obvious. If K first touches their free kick in the neutral zone, what is to be gained by R in replaying the down, assuming rational decisions by both sides?

OK, I suppose if K's kicker is really, really weak and has trouble getting the ball to go any distance at all, R might decline a spot of touching by K 9 yards into the NZ in the hope that his next kick won't even go that far.

Are you being intentionally obtuse (i.e. trolling), or have you simply not watched much football? I can't tell which, but this is a really dumb response.

How about --- first touching on the 1. I'm taking the rekick if it's an option. Good luck pinning us there twice.

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Are you being intentionally obtuse (i.e. trolling), or have you simply not watched much football? I can't tell which, but this is a really dumb response.

How about --- first touching on the 1. I'm taking the rekick if it's an option. Good luck pinning us there twice.

What part of "sometimes" do you not understand?