The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 24, 2012, 11:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
NFHS 2-31:

ART. 2 . . . A forward pass is a pass thrown with its initial direction toward the
opponent’s end line.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
NFHS 2-31:

ART. 2 . . . A forward pass is a pass thrown with its initial direction toward the
opponent’s end line.
The important part for this discussion is not that, but the "NOTE" that follows immediately afterward. However...

"NOTE: Prior to releasing the ball on a pass, if the potential passer is contacted, and the ball is released, it is a forward pass if his arm was moving forward on contact."

...notice that it says "if", not "if and only if". That seems to allow for the possibility of its being a forward pass even if the arm wasn't moving forward. Then you're thrown back on 2-31-1&2, which leave it arguable as to exactly when a pass begins in Fed rules. It says, "In a pass, the ball travels in flight." However, it's not clear whether that's just a requirement for there having been a pass or defines the entire extent of the pass. If it defines the entire extent of the pass, then the movement of the ball in the passer's hand is not part of the pass and so doesn't determine its initial direction. If, however, it just determines that a pass has occurred, then with the wording "throwing the ball" it is at least arguable that the motion of the ball in the passer's hand is its initial direction.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 25, 2012, 10:07am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,518
Robert,

This is clear to actual officials because that is how it has been called and the interpretation for years. Others like yourself might want to find nits in the information and not understand why these interpretations are the way they are, but it is clear that we do not determine (also based on what other codes do) that we judge this by the movement of the arm. It is not our job to figure out if there is a pump fake or a pass when a player is hit. That is also why you hear things like "empty hand" when someone is trying to throw and other philosophies that go along with why we have to determine the motion direction of the arm.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 25, 2012, 08:02pm
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Then you're thrown back on 2-31-1&2, which leave it arguable as to exactly when a pass begins in Fed rules. It says, "In a pass, the ball travels in flight." However, it's not clear whether that's just a requirement for there having been a pass or defines the entire extent of the pass. If it defines the entire extent of the pass, then the movement of the ball in the passer's hand is not part of the pass and so doesn't determine its initial direction. If, however, it just determines that a pass has occurred, then with the wording "throwing the ball" it is at least arguable that the motion of the ball in the passer's hand is its initial direction.
Robert:

Since you don't have a pass until the ball is "in flight", it follows that the initial direction of a pass is the direction it takes after leaving the passer's hand.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 29, 2012, 12:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: midwest/plains
Posts: 402
Is there any difference whether or not the "Passer" is behind or beyond the LOS? Behind the LOS I would not doubt calling this an incomplete pass. The action beyond the LOS is why I questioned it. IMO he didn't intend to pass, but as has been said intent is not the determining factor. I believe that the the note applies, it is a forward pass, and therefore illegal, the ball became dead when it struck the ground. It will be a first down for B, after the 15 yard penalty.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 29, 2012, 01:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reffing Rev. View Post
Is there any difference whether or not the "Passer" is behind or beyond the LOS? Behind the LOS I would not doubt calling this an incomplete pass. The action beyond the LOS is why I questioned it. IMO he didn't intend to pass, but as has been said intent is not the determining factor. I believe that the the note applies, it is a forward pass, and therefore illegal, the ball became dead when it struck the ground. It will be a first down for B, after the 15 yard penalty.
Yes, you can have a pass without a passer. If you couldn't, there would be no such thing as an incomplete illegal forward pass.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
One forward pass phansen Football 5 Tue Sep 15, 2009 05:06pm
forward pass/backwards pass cyrick Football 8 Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:59pm
forward pass kkid091 Football 2 Tue Nov 08, 2005 06:49am
Pass Interference on an Illegal Forward Pass OverAndBack Football 8 Mon Aug 23, 2004 03:11pm
Forward Pass Derock1986 Football 3 Mon Dec 02, 2002 12:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1