The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 30, 2002, 05:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to pepper551
Defensive player A1 slips and falls offensive player B1 falls on top of A1 and makes no attempt to get up. Is B1 holding?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 30, 2002, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 489
Lightbulb Yes, if you judge it to be intentional.

I'm assuming that there was a change of possession during the play prior to the holding foul. A is the team that puts the ball into play and B is the opponent. The offense is the team in possession of the ball and the defense is the opponent. Just checking...

My working definition of holding is any intentional act not permited by rule that prevents an opponent from moving. Based on your example, I would not have a holding foul unless it was near the point of attack. In my view what you would have in most cases is a legal "pancake" block. So I would caution you to get a good look at the action and rule a legal block if you are not sure.
__________________
Mike Simonds
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 30, 2002, 06:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 710
I think the crux of the matter is if the player (B1 in this case) is grasping the opponent in order to keep him from getting up. If he's laying flat on him and does not try to prevent the opponent from getting up by holding him down with his hands, I've got nothing.

I see D lineman fall during their charge and the A lineman blocking him will fall on him and keep him there. Good play, in my opinion, as long as he doesn't hold him there with his hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 30, 2002, 09:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2
Send a message via Yahoo to pepper551
The play I refered to acured in game Eagles vs Giants. Giants had ball and scored a "TD" It was called back for offensive holding. O lineman laid on fallen D lineman TD called back. If anyone saw the play Was it the right call? Thanks

[Edited by pepper551 on Dec 30th, 2002 at 09:56 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 30, 2002, 11:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 169
Re: Yes, if you judge it to be intentional.

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Simonds
In my view what you would have in most cases is a legal "pancake" block. So I would caution you to get a good look at the action and rule a legal block if you are not sure.
Careful. Although it is not often called, the "pancake" is not legal. It is a violation of 9-4-2e, positioning oneself on the body of an opponent to gain an advantage - 15 yards. It is usually not called because the play is most likely not affected directly, but the "pancake" block engenders ill will and should not be tolerated.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2002, 07:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 131
a pancake block is very legal.


a pancake BLOCK is when you drive the defender into the ground . whats illegal about that?

as for the eagles game, and sorry im from phila and may sound bias here. the official said it was a bad camera angle and there was holding on the play. i didn't think there was a hold either, but thats their call.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2002, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
If a player is laying on top of an opponent is such a way as to prevent that player from getting up - that's holding (or more correctly a violation of 9-4-2e; I need to look that one up!). I generally don't call this as I (as R) usually see this well behind the play. I give a stiff lecture to the offender and that takes care of that.
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2002, 11:47am
JMN JMN is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 296
You can't keep a good man down!

Don't know about the NFL, but if I'm the U on a game where B lineman slips and A lineman falls on top to keep him down, I 9 out of 10 times will probably not have a call. I will watch closely for any "aftermath" and I will caution A that holding a man down on the ground is holding, but I probably won't throw unless it directly affects the play or develops into something more serious (like a personal foul or UC).

The next play is a great time to remind all A players as they come to the line that laying on top of a B player is in fact technically holding, so don't do it! My guess is that most coaches don't know this rule, either.


The only time I might call this is if A weighs 350lbs and B tops the scales at 150lbs and I risk having to stop the game and call in the "Jaws of Life" to save the poor B kid!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2002, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 379
I don't believe it's holding because the player hasn't used his hands, arms or legs to hook, lock, clamp, grasp, encircle or hold in an effort to restrain his opponent. He's simply lying on top of him.

9-4-2e does not involve "holding" but is rather a personal foul call. The examples given in the Case Book show the intent of this rule and it clearly doesn't apply here. It's the old "climb on my shoulders and block the kick" rule.

Good play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1