The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 29, 2009, 11:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppaltice View Post
JRod, when you told a player to go to his huddle for staring, you put yourself in a position that spiraled into an eventual disqualification. At the most, you could make your presence known to both players by stating: 'Play's over!' Do I think you were right in giving an USC to the player for ignoring your request 3 times: yes. Do I think you should have made the request: no.

The second player you flagged, if I am correct, was for staring at his opponent (and not for ignoring your request to go to his huddle 3 times as the first)? Essentially, you made staring an USC foul.

Maybe it is because I am in the heart of the SEC, but officials throwing capricious unsportsmanlike fouls are coming under fire.

I may be alone, but I think you handled the situations poorly.
I agree that there's a fine line here. Preventive officiating sometimes requires stepping in and actively sending players back to their huddles. On routine plays, though, you're right to try to stay back and watch.

If I judge that I need to step in and the player ignores my repeated instruction, we'll have a problem. I like to think that I don't step in overly often (had one in a JV game this year), and try to use the tools of preventive officiating with discretion.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 29, 2009, 12:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 28
thanks!

Thanks everyone for both sides of the argument!!! Great discussion.

Perhaps in Minnesota we're much less tolerant of baiting and taunting. The player wasn't just "staring." He was committing and act that was meant to intimidate and incite ill will on an opposing player. The only difference between what he did and hovering over a player on the ground in an intimidating manner was that the opponent wasn't on the ground. The action is meaningless to the game of football other than inciting ill will (unlike say a rip move by a DE which is essentially throwing a sucker punch in the direction of an opponent - that is a meaningful football move). It's an action that precludes something much worse such as throwing a punch - you don't get the chance to "knock it off" in that case.

All great things. Perhaps my initial flag was too quick. Perhaps I let A's bench get in my head a little more than I'm willing to admit, so my flag came out quickly. The one thing you can't change I guess is that player committed acts that were meant to intimidate and incite ill will, which is against the rules. Just because they let players get away with that on Saturdays and Sundays doesn't mean anything for Friday night.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taunting MNBlue Football 10 Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:59pm
Taunting rainmaker Basketball 18 Thu Jan 26, 2006 05:49pm
Taunting toolsoh Basketball 15 Thu Nov 18, 2004 01:56pm
Taunting Buckeyes Football 3 Tue Aug 10, 2004 12:42am
Taunting? Or What? rainmaker Basketball 6 Wed Feb 06, 2002 10:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1