|
|||
Blocking Below The Waist
Last night we had our annual rules clinic. The state commissioner (I'm in LA) gave a very interesting interpretation/guidance/policy on blocking below the waist. He stated that if the QB was in the shotgun, lineman in the 3- and 4-point stances would be permitted to block below the waist on an immediate charge. Lineman in a 2-point stance (where the QB is in the shotgun) would not be permitted to block below the waist.
This really simplifies things from an officiating standpoint, we no longer will have to judge whether or not the low block was an immediate charge. Of course coaches won't be too happy because 90% of the time when a QB is in the shotgun, the linemen are in a 2-point stance. What interpretations are there in other states? |
|
|||
There is a very specific comment in the case book about this as well. Not sure why your interpreter chose to vary from that by not allowing the player in a 2-point stance from executing a block that is legal.
|
|
|||
It's a proxy criterion to substitute for "the ball is quicker than the eye" determination of whether contact is initiated before the ball leaves the zone.
|
|
|||
Canadian Ruling
BBW in Canada is illegal except:
- if the block occurs in the CLPA - was executed by a player who was set in the CLPA at the time of the snap - did not enter, leave, and re-enter the CLPA prior to the snap What is the CLPA? It's the Close Line Play Area. It's a rectangle from tackle to tackle, 2 yards behind and beyond the LS. I think it's similar to the FBZ???
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Nebraska the same, though in our on-line rules meeting the speaker forgot to say it was when the QB is in shotgun, he just said any delayed block below the waist is illegal, but the slide showed the QB in the shotgun.
|
|
|||
Quote:
I personally am happy with this interpretation because I always allowed these types of blocks (because of the case book guidance), but I never agreed with it. My reasoning is that the term 'immediate charge' leaves entirely too much gray area. Most of the time, in these shotgun situations, the tackles have a little stagger from the other linemen and as a result, the defensive lineman would then be about two yards away from the OT. The DL would then take 1-2 steps prior to the block being initiated - although acceptable (as per the case book), that block is clearly illegal. Also, I don't think it agrees with the intent of the rule. To be perfectly honest, I think the rule should be that there will be no blocking below the waist unless the QB is in the position to receive the snap directly from the center. In my opinion, High School players are not skilled enough to properly execute these low blocks (hence the rule), so we shouldn't allow them - unless it truly is a bang-bang snap-block situation. |
|
|||
Despite what the case book says, it has been determined around here that in a shotgun formation no blocks below the waist will be allowed. Our opinion is the ball is out of the zone faster than most linemen can react to the snap and start their "dive" which our local interpreter has confirmed via tape. Even simpler to officiate. In the preseason meetings with the coaches, this has been explained and acknowledged.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem Last edited by Mike L; Fri Aug 14, 2009 at 11:25am. Reason: because there's a difference between "waste" & "waist" |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
...and thanks Mike L, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one that felt that way. |
|
|||
Quote:
We've found in the "pistol", the QB tends to set up right about 3 yds back and is usually immediately moving back sometimes before he's even got the ball, which makes it essentially the same as the shotgun as far as the ball being out. The wildcat? We havn't seen too much of that around here, but it would still depend on where he sets up and what action he takes with the snap. If he's falling back or fading back with a sweep motion, again I'd say the ball is out. If he's moving forward for a run, probably ok.
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The key to simplifying this unnecessarily complicated discussion is to remember that the position of a player without the ball makes no difference to judging whether the ball leaves the FBZ. You don't have to watch the player taking the snap at all, only the ball. Who cares whether the player was moving backward or forward or stationary at the time he caught it? The only thing this proposed change would do is eliminate the difficult call or other proxy criteria where the snap ended outside the FBZ and the linemen charged with the snap. The ball would have been deemed to have been outside the FBZ before any BBW occurred. Roberrt |
Bookmarks |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/54306-blocking-below-waist.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
CoachHuey.com - cut block one man over | This thread | Refback | Mon Jun 11, 2012 04:23pm |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
blocking below the waist | Murd | Football | 14 | Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:23am |
Blocking below the waist. | Agreen_14 | Football | 16 | Wed Aug 22, 2007 04:52pm |
Blocking Below the Waist | JS63 | Football | 3 | Fri Oct 20, 2006 01:12pm |
Blocking Below the Waist | NoCall | Football | 3 | Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:37am |
blocking below the waist NF vs NFL | gottaknow | Football | 3 | Mon Jul 18, 2005 04:17am |