The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2009, 01:15am
ODJ ODJ is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
didn't it read...zero coaches in the box on a live ball?
Yes. There is now (as in NCAA) a 2 yard buffer zone.
Sideline. You. 2 yards. Chain crew. Coaches.

I'd think sideline warnings will decline.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2009, 09:09am
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
I'm with Rut on the horse collar thing. I don't see it that much, if at all and much like facemasking, holding, and BIB, what we see is way different than what you hear yelled from the sidelines.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2009, 12:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODJ View Post
Yes. There is now (as in NCAA) a 2 yard buffer zone.
Sideline. You. 2 yards. Chain crew. Coaches.

I'd think sideline warnings will decline.

I think you might see more, at first.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2009, 02:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
The "sideline control" revisions seem like a great, sensible and very appropriate adjustment. This has never been an issue about practical differences, there simply are no practical arguments against any of these revisions that make any sense.

This issue has always been a question about practical, sound, safety related measures opposed to some obscure notion of territorial control that has been little more than a figment of the imagination.

For the same basic reasons there are rules that govern the interaction between pedestrians and trucks, there needs to be sensible guidelines governing the interaction between persons operating immediately on, or outside, a football sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2009, 03:23pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
I wonder how long it will be before we see the following rule changes press release "We have dispensed with all NFHS rules and will now be adopting the rules of the NCAA."
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2009, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
I wonder how long it will be before we see the following rule changes press release "We have dispensed with all NFHS rules and will now be adopting the rules of the NCAA."
Fed started with NCAA's rules for football. So did the NFL. NCAA inherited them too; the football rules committee spawned NCAA, not vice versa.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 11:40am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
My point was that it seems the Fed seems to be trending towards the current NCAA rules a bit more each year.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
My point was that it seems the Fed seems to be trending towards the current NCAA rules a bit more each year.
We can only hope! It sure would be easier on guys that call HS and college.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 01:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
My point was that it seems the Fed seems to be trending towards the current NCAA rules a bit more each year.
For a number of years there was a liaison committee between them. But that was a long time ago as far as most of you would be concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 01:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaybird View Post
We can only hope! It sure would be easier on guys that call HS and college.
You have to consider that NFHS rules apply to children playing football at both the sandlot and Seconday School levels between the ages of 8 and 18, which represents a completely different participation group than NCAA rule which are designed to manage a participation group between the ages of 19-30.

Considering the physical nature of the game of football, the contact involved at each different level plus the accumulative effect of proficiency gained by repetitive experience it makes little sense to think the same rules would be equally effective for participants between ages 8 to 30, or even more, years old.

Difficulty in calling games, is not a major concern, although thousands of competent officials have dealt with and mastered those difficulties when choosing to work through, or to, different levels.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 02:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaybird View Post
We can only hope! It sure would be easier on guys that call HS and college.
Jay, I don't give a hoot about making it easier for guys who call both. That's their choice.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 05:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 278
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp View Post
Jay, I don't give a hoot about making it easier for guys who call both. That's their choice.

It does make it easier in the sense that there is less crap from the idiots in the stands. They "KNOW" the NCAA rules and apply them to high school. It's worse at the youth level because the coaches are in that category as well. I can just see it know when I make the first horse collar call and they tell me it's about time since I didn't call it all of last year!
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 07:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Whatever particular rules code you happen to be working under makes little difference to "the idiot in the stands". Being correct is not one of his objectives, and it really doesn't matter to him whether you're correct, or not.

He just wants to sound smart and impress other idiots in the stands. The more attention you pay to anything he shouts, the happier he will be. The sooner you learn to totally ignore him, the better officiating will become.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 07:36pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
He just wants to sound smart and impress other idiots in the stands. The more attention you pay to anything he shouts, the happier he will be. The sooner you learn to totally ignore him, the better officiating will become.
This does not apply as much in the football arena. But in the basketball arena, there are times when a stupid fan is noticed by the officials; they tend to back off, because they have just embarrassed the people around them or who they are with. You would be surprised how many crawl into a hole when they act stupid in front of others and it brings the attention of their peers.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 18, 2009, 07:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
The "sideline control" revisions seem like a great, sensible and very appropriate adjustment. This has never been an issue about practical differences, there simply are no practical arguments against any of these revisions that make any sense.

This issue has always been a question about practical, sound, safety related measures opposed to some obscure notion of territorial control that has been little more than a figment of the imagination.

For the same basic reasons there are rules that govern the interaction between pedestrians and trucks, there needs to be sensible guidelines governing the interaction between persons operating immediately on, or outside, a football sideline.
OK, it is in the rule book but how vigilantly will it be enforced. I can almost bet every other crew in my association will not enforce it out of fear they will be marked down.
__________________
Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rules changes NFHS RILAX Lacrosse 0 Thu Aug 12, 2004 02:17pm
NFHS Bat Rules WestMichBlue Softball 24 Fri Apr 16, 2004 09:40pm
New rules for NFHS RILAX Lacrosse 4 Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:48am
NFHS rules on the web? Xplayer Basketball 1 Fri Nov 07, 2003 09:11pm
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1