Possible rules changes for 2009

[Adam]

Originally Posted by ajmc

OK SnaQwells you now have the opportunity to lay out the facts that would validate the changes you've added, and charges you've made, or you can slink back under the rock of unsubstantiated character assassination. Your choice.

wow, it's tempting to quote the self-appointed moral arbiter of the football forum.

Originally Posted by ajmc

Now, you're just being silly. Do you really expect me to wallow through all the garbage that's been laid out to prove to you where the smell comes from. Not likely.

I don't slink, however. This is really simple.

Kurt claimed he was not selling anything.
Kurt is selling stuff directly related to A-11, and his profit potential would be significantly diminished (that means he won't make as much, in case you live in Rio Linda) if the A-11 loophole is closed.

I believe this satisfies both of my assertions.

FWIW, I'm all for making a profit off of an idea; just be honest about it. There's a reason we demand full disclosure from information sources.

People don't trust lung cancer studies paid for by tobacco companies.