|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Again, this from the person decrying personal attacks. LOL.
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell! |
|
|||
Can you imagine him on your crew.
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
I haven't offered an opinion about anyone, I've just answered a direct question, stupid and leading as it may have been. When I have nothing worth adding, I usually try and remain silent, but I've interacted enough with you to know all I need to know about how best to respond to you, considering all your barking and bluster. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Call it what you like, but it is true. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
All this nonsense started because you didn't like, and just can't accept, that you, and others, let your mouths get in the way of your thoughts and felt it more important to strut your ego than keep a discussion civil. If you want to act like a bully and a blow hard, that's entirely up to you, but you shouldn't be surprised when you're told it's making you look like an azz. Sadly, this ego thing makes a lot of the rest of us look like azzes, simply by association. It's your parent's job to teach you how to speak, and not my role to make up for what they failed to get across, but when overblown ego and a rampant sense of self importance splashes mud on the rest of us, it needs to be pointed out, because you're just not competent enough to realize it by yourselves. If any of you have some rational question, simple or not, you need answered, and can figure out how to ask it rationally and I'll be happy to answer it. Do us all a favor by not wasting your time asking me to put words in someone else's mouth or to surmise why they did, or didn't do, whatever it is you want an explanation about. That's not my role either. |
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN37F...eature=related |
|
||||
Quote:
wow, it's tempting to quote the self-appointed moral arbiter of the football forum. Quote:
Kurt claimed he was not selling anything. Kurt is selling stuff directly related to A-11, and his profit potential would be significantly diminished (that means he won't make as much, in case you live in Rio Linda) if the A-11 loophole is closed. I believe this satisfies both of my assertions. FWIW, I'm all for making a profit off of an idea; just be honest about it. There's a reason we demand full disclosure from information sources. People don't trust lung cancer studies paid for by tobacco companies.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
It should be easy
Well said. Haven't been here in a couple of months, see a thread with proposed rule changes and think "Ooh, neat, let's see what's being discussed."
Gadzooks this whole thread seems a waste of too much effort. Want to get rid of the A-11? Limit the numbering exception to fourth down. Allows offense to substitute specialty players to cover the likely scrimmage kick and preserves ability to quick kick on other downs, where it is highly improbable a team would reveal the intention of quick kicking by utilizing the numbering exception. Why isn't it this simple? |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
fat lady is singing, hello kettle!, hyena love |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New 2009 BRD Questions | SAump | Baseball | 18 | Wed Dec 31, 2008 01:08am |
2008 - 2009 Rules Interps Situation 6 | mdray | Basketball | 4 | Fri Oct 31, 2008 02:11pm |
NFHS Rules Changes 2009 (Sort of) | Tim C | Baseball | 29 | Thu Jul 03, 2008 09:25am |