![]() |
|
|
|||
Untimed down or not?
I have two instances that happened in the same game.
Situation 1. A11 is running down the sideline as time expires in the second quarter. As A11 is tackled, B2 commits a facemask penalty. The clock had expired before the penalty occured. A accepts the five yard penalty. Does A get one untimed down before the half ends? Situation 2. With time running down to end the game A is trying to get to the line a scrimmage and get a play off. With four seconds left on the clock, A commits a false start and the penalty causes the clock to stop with four seconds left. B accepts the penalty. Two questions here... does the clock start on the snap or on the ready for play? If the clock starts on the ready for play and A does not get a snap off before the clock expires, are they given an opportunity to run an untimed down?
__________________
"The more you sweat in times of peace, the less you bleed during war." - Paton |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Sit 1: Yes, any time you have a penalty by either team during the last timed down and the penalty is accepted you extend by one Untimed down.
Sit 2: What I was taught when trying to determine clock status after a foul was to remove the foul from the situation and use the resulting clock status for example; Clock is running, Previous Down ends, Ready for play, False Start, Ready for play, Snap Becomes... Previous Down ends, Ready for play, Snap.....Clock would have never stopped therefore after the penalty enforcement you wind the clock on the RFP another example Clock is running, Previous Down ends with ball out of bounds (clock stops), Ready for play, False Start, Ready for play, Snap Becomes... Previous Down ends (clock stops), Ready for play, Snap..... after enforcement you have the clock starting on the Snap The only exception to that rule is if you have a Delay of Game Penalty which will start the clock on the snap regardless of the previous status. So to answer Sit 2 The clock will start on the RFP and no, I will not give them an untimed down because the False start is a Dead ball foul and (I'm assuming) the last timed down did not have a foul. |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is a 15-yard + AFD Unnecessary Roughness Penalty. Points of Application are among Point of Last Scrimmage (PLS), Point Ball Held (PBH), or Point Ball Dead (PBD), at A's option. Basically, A chooses what point is best for them. Since this was the last play of the quarter, A can choose to apply the foul at the beginning of the next quarter. If the foul is applied in the same quarter, yes, there is one more play. Quote:
We're obviously under the 3-minute warning, so any penalty application causes the clock to start on the snap. B can decline the penalty to force the clock to start on the RFP, essentially assuring that this will be the last play. However, since 4 seconds would likely come off the clock no matter what type of play is run, A wil not have the opportunity to sneak in two plays, therefore, B's best option is to accept the penalty, thereby forcing A to navigate those 5 extra yards to be successful.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
In situation #2, assuming the poster is asking about, becasue there was an accepted penalty, team-A would get an untimed down if the clock happened to expire before they could snap it.
Case book 3.3.3 SITUATION B. Many of use that work both rule codes feel this is a bad NFHS rule, but never the less, one to understand because you know you're going to get an argument on it from team-B coach. >>> Actually, I may be wrong on this.. Anyone else care to take a shot. The FS foul did not occur during the last timed down. It's bascially a dead ball foul, so now I'm waffling on whether this quailfies for an extenstion for team-A. Last edited by Theisey; Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 11:51am. |
|
|||
Quote:
I would tend to think that because of the FS being a DB foul that the clock would start on the RFP and no untimed down since the foul wasn't during the last live ball of the period. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Untimed down | garwood8499 | Football | 2 | Sat Oct 07, 2006 08:13am |
Untimed Down | Gman34 | Football | 3 | Sun Oct 16, 2005 05:21pm |
untimed down or not? | yankeesfan | Football | 9 | Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:13pm |
Untimed Down | WhistlesAndStripes | Football | 3 | Sun Sep 04, 2005 06:58pm |
untimed down or not.....?? | otis3zeb | Football | 5 | Sun Sep 22, 2002 08:39pm |