The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MST
Posts: 248
why 12?

What league/state that allows 12 players and why did they do that?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 03:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Kent View Post
What league/state that allows 12 players and why did they do that?
Canadian football. 12 players on a 110 Yard field.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 03:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Kent View Post
What league/state that allows 12 players and why did they do that?
Actually 11 players and the tiny U.S. field was because Harvard did not have enough room on their field for the proper size Rugby pitch and so 100 yards with 10 yard end zones and 11 players was born!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 03:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,130
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43 View Post
Actually 11 players and the tiny U.S. field was because Harvard did not have enough room on their field for the proper size Rugby pitch and so 100 yards with 10 yard end zones and 11 players was born!
A nice bit of trivia
__________________
Ed Hickland, MBA, CCP
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 04:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 945
That was far from a hook and whatever you want to call it. 5 backward passes on the last play of the game. And the second one was almost caught with a knee down.

So do Canadian rules only state that the teams must be dressed differently and not one in a colored jersey and the other in white? It wasn't hard to tell them apart but maroon and bright red on the same field looks odd to us southerners. It was like seeing Nebraska play Texas A&M both in home uniforms.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 12, 2008, 04:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrenkicker View Post
That was far from a hook and whatever you want to call it. 5 backward passes on the last play of the game. And the second one was almost caught with a knee down.

So do Canadian rules only state that the teams must be dressed differently and not one in a colored jersey and the other in white? It wasn't hard to tell them apart but maroon and bright red on the same field looks odd to us southerners. It was like seeing Nebraska play Texas A&M both in home uniforms.
You must remember that the budgets for high school football in Canada are vastly different than in the U.S. There are not too many high schools with two sets of uniforms. So we must deal with uniforms that could look similar.

The Canadian rule book does not specify that the schools must wear different colours.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 03:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: N.D.
Posts: 1,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43 View Post
You must remember that the budgets for high school football in Canada are vastly different than in the U.S. There are not too many high schools with two sets of uniforms. So we must deal with uniforms that could look similar.

The Canadian rule book does not specify that the schools must wear different colours.

Couldn't they just "borrow" the hockey sweaters? Isn't that where the money goes?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 07:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 89
The (Cdn.) rule book doesn't specify different color uniforms but it does state, in Rule 1, Section 11, Article 1 (b) that, "No team shall wear uniforms that blend closely with the color of the ball...". Ergo, the lack of "Wild Rust" and "Antique Tawny" colors in uniform styling north of the border. It's all about fashion though, right boys?

I did a HS game three weeks ago where the home team wore white jerseys with navy blue pants and navy blue helmets. Away team? Yep, Light grey uniforms with navy blue pants and navy blue helmets. A night game too. And lousy lighting. And many of the home jerseys were dirty.

The ONLY difference was that one team had TV numbers, the other didn't. There was a fumble/scramble near the end of the game that resulted in a massive pile of bodies and when we finally peeled everyone off, we knew who had the ball, but didn't have a clue, given the conditions already mentioned, what team he played for.

I finally just said the heck with it and shouted, "69 has possession of the ball. 69....what damn team do you play for??". Didn't think he was going to lie about that one.....gotta love three down football, eh?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 07:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwcfoa43 View Post
Actually 11 players and the tiny U.S. field was because Harvard did not have enough room on their field for the proper size Rugby pitch and so 100 yards with 10 yard end zones and 11 players was born!
Not true. Harvard played 15s with everyone else until Yale prevailed to reduce sides to 11s in 1880, with an accompanying reduction in width of the field to what we have now. Yale had been used to a soccer-like game and wouldn't play the rugby game until then, but yielded on everything else and got as a concession a reduction in the number of players. Isn't that strange, conceding on a change in the entire nature of the game but getting the number of players they'd been used to? You'd think once you changed your game to that degree, your attitude about those particulars would change. Can you imagine if their baseball team had been in on the negotiations, and we'd be playing 9 a side now?

What you may be thinking about is that in 1906 consideration was given to widening the field, but the cement had just been poured for Harvard's Soldiers Field, which wouldn't accommodate the widening that was considered.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 16, 2008, 05:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Not true. Harvard played 15s with everyone else until Yale prevailed to reduce sides to 11s in 1880, with an accompanying reduction in width of the field to what we have now. Yale had been used to a soccer-like game and wouldn't play the rugby game until then, but yielded on everything else and got as a concession a reduction in the number of players. Isn't that strange, conceding on a change in the entire nature of the game but getting the number of players they'd been used to? You'd think once you changed your game to that degree, your attitude about those particulars would change. Can you imagine if their baseball team had been in on the negotiations, and we'd be playing 9 a side now?

What you may be thinking about is that in 1906 consideration was given to widening the field, but the cement had just been poured for Harvard's Soldiers Field, which wouldn't accommodate the widening that was considered.

Robert

Where did you find this trivia? Rites of Autumn? Some other history? (I will probably read immediately after finding out what it is) The stuff from Yale and Harvard is always so interesting; think Alonzo Stagg.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 16, 2008, 09:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkishowl20 View Post
Where did you find this trivia? Rites of Autumn? Some other history?
Damned if I can remember. I did a lot of study of this subject decades ago, but the business about Yale & 11s is widely available.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
hook and ladder play MJT Football 9 Fri Aug 25, 2006 01:33pm
"Leaving Early" (pitch) to pull up socks Dakota Softball 17 Fri May 26, 2006 12:57pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1