![]() |
|
|
|||
So then R can try to recover risk-free if the subsequent muff goes into the EZ? Hardly seems fair. It does seem fair that K gets the TD.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
It was the Bears Vikings game. What happened was the MIN punter missed the kick and the Bears recovered in MIN EZ. R recovered not K. Thus the reason the Bears were rewarded with a TD.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me |
|
|||
Quote:
original post refers to a differnt play in Vikes\Bears game--where Viking returner was blocking and a bouncing kick hit him--bounced into the end zone and recovered by the Bears. Lots of special team errors for the Vikes in this game. |
|
|||
Quote:
Under NFHS rules, this is a touchback. Under NCAA and NFL, this is a touchdown for K because the ball was touched in the field of play by R. |
|
|||
Quote:
Thanks! |
|
|||
Quote:
In your play K5 mishandled the snap, there was a scrum for the ball, K5 intentionally kicked the ball towards the LOS as it lay on the ground, and R25 picked up the ball and ran for a touchdown. In the NFL Gamebook Chicago was credited with a block punt for a TD.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Muffed Punt on 3rd down | gtwbam | Football | 3 | Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:17am |
Muffed Punt Into End Zone | Uh fishy 8 | Football | 14 | Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:01pm |
MNF: Muffed punt | tpaul | Football | 4 | Tue Oct 11, 2005 07:15am |
Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |