|
|||
Quote:
So the video of him throwing the ball high into the air is lying?
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever. |
|
|||
The calling official, Mike McCabe, is an excellent official. But hearing Dave Cutaia speak numerous times at Camp, my interpretation of his statment is that the call is defensible by rule but shouldn't have been made. I would bet he graded it internally as a "marginal call."
Look for this call to be discussed in Dave Parry's training tape next year. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Committee Person speaks out
It seems the NCAA Football Committee is also backing this call. Quote:
When asked if the official should have used his judgment and let the play go, Edsall said the celebration rule has "been harped on as a point of emphasis" for the past several months. The official, Edsall said, had no choice but to call it or risk being suspended. Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Do you know who actually flagged? I have heard there is a long-standing resistance by the PAC10 to any sort of combined officiating organization, so perhaps they (Cutaia) are saying they really do not care what Parry says. |
|
|||
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Toss a ball over your shoulder and see if it takes 4 seconds to land AND see if it hits you in the head.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm not questioning the call or that the rule exists. I'm questioning why the rule exists. If it's delay of game, that seems pretty specious to me (and why it would then be 15 yards if it's not about showboating or grandstanding and not just 5 like every other delay of game I've ever heard of, I don't know). The call was (obviously) correct by rule. That's the way your bosses (conference, supervisor, crew chief) want it called, you call it or you do something else with your leisure time. I get that. Harsh call. Unfortunate call. Brings unwarranted attention to what we do in a negative light and lets loose every columnist who's never officiated a snap in his life, yet who writes 600 words about how we do what we do and how every call is a judgment call despite the fact they've never ever sat in a rules meeting or had our mechanics explained to them. I'm just saying I don't quite grasp why the rule exists in that form with the idea of it being called to cover that situation. I'm pretty conservative by nature, but I just don't see what harm was caused.
__________________
"And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport."---Greatest. Official. Ever. |
|
|||
http://web1.ncaa.org/web_video/NCAAN...3/19830817.pdf
The rule was written into the rulebook apparently in 1983. (See page 7 of the linked document) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Excuse me "Over&Back", in the u-tube video, although somewhat conjested when the ball is released, it does look like it was thrown in the air. Watching the game LIVE there was a completely different, unimpeded, much closer view and it appeared he threw the ball over his shoulder, and it went directly down.
Needless to say, there were several repeats of the end of the play offered by the network, and they all looked the same. U-tube vs Network coverage, you be the judge. If the ball was thrown high up in the air, I've got no problem with the call that was made, but that's not what I saw (or believe I saw) in which case although the call may well have been technically correct, I don't think it was right. |
|
|||
You don't suppose the networks realize that by showing the tight shot they can manipulate opinions do you??? The media are the ones who are the most vocal whiners right now about the call. The video has to support what the talking heads are saying to enhance their credibility.
The one camera shot that I have seen which has the true perspective is the one from the press box watching from a wide angle as Locker tumbled into the EZ and then hopped up and launching the ball underhanded. If you have not seen that then you have not seen what really happened. And as the physics gurus here have shown the ball had to have been launched 15 - 30 feet high based on how long it took from release until it came down into view again. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
________ Washington medical marijuana dispensaries Last edited by youngump; Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 06:23pm. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What did Tom Eades do to get mad at the SEC Officials Supervisor? | secondregionbug | Basketball | 6 | Fri Nov 16, 2007 01:49pm |
SEC supervisor | gscsj | Football | 2 | Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:08am |
SEC Supervisor Ousted | ShadowStripes | Basketball | 49 | Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:09pm |
IM Supervisor | lukealex | Basketball | 27 | Sat Jul 23, 2005 06:30pm |
To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |