The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 30, 2008, 08:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: Earlier this month, the NFHS Interpreters' Meeting was held in Indianapolis. Note: This was not the Rules Committee so they were not at liberty to make any rule changes. The A11 was discussed. Here's a brief synopsis of the discussion from one of the attendees who regulary publishes on the NFHS board. So, this is the real scoop--from the Federation:

"After reading the previous earier thread about what the Fed might have said regarding the legality of the A-11 offense, I'm offering the following summary of what was discussed at the recent interpreters meeting in Indy.

There was a presentation on the A-11 at the meeting. The presentation included video of all of Piedmont's offensive plays in the first half of a game. It was very confusing and difficult to tell how many players were on the LOS. Moreover, on several plays, ineligibles ran downfield on pass patterns, then blocked defensive backs. In those situations, a pass was thrown and completed behind the LOS, thus avoiding any OPI or ineligible downfield fouls. On a few other plays, it looked like there were not enough players on the LOS.

The conclusion of the group (including members of the editorial committee) is that there is nothing in the rules to make the offense illegal. While no one liked it, I think that penalizing it because we don't like it would be inappropriate.

Attendees were asked a somewhat rhetorical question as to what should be done: make it illegal, or do nothing and hope it dies on its own. We discussed the NCAA language ("obvious kicking situation") but some felt that description was too general and subject to too much interpretation. Others felt that the offense would go away on its own, because a sharp defensive coordinator could easily find ways to neutralize the offense. Moreover, everyone understood that any rule change to make the offense illegal will have to be done at the rules meeting in January. Until then, there's not much we can do to prevent it, and we shouldn't penalize a team for using it, notwithstanding our feelings about the offense.

If anyone wants to suggest a language change, the deadline is October 31. Work with your state association, because the NFHS will only accept proposed rules changes from state associations."
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3rd strike dropped hits me, hits batter out of box chuck chopper Softball 8 Sat May 07, 2005 01:21am
ball hits top of bb in or out StevenW Basketball 4 Wed Aug 06, 2003 11:40am
batter hits ball after hits ground kfinucan Softball 13 Sun Jun 29, 2003 09:29pm
Scoring hits Newbie Baseball 1 Mon Apr 28, 2003 06:06am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1