The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
reply and thank you

Dear BktballRef,

You simply asked me in your earlier post above how many people had contacted us about it?

Just being honest and thank you.

Kurt
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 09:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Yes sir, and that's exactly my point.

We won't settle anything here. But good luck and Marry Christmas.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 11:23pm
RMR RMR is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 79
Coach:

Does California (you are in Calif. right?) not break football schools into classifications A, AA, AAA, AAAA, etc?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 11:38pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
Dear BktballRef,

You simply asked me in your earlier post above how many people had contacted us about it?

Just being honest and thank you.

Kurt
That all sounds great and wonderful but now you have highlighting a flaw in the rules that are currently on the books. I would not be surprised if individuals take your claims and change the rule. You even posted this on the NF website to highlight the issue with the rule and how this offense is so great. And I do believe that people from the NF read some of these boards for rules situations so they can get an idea of what might be going on throughout the country and make recommendations based on possible rules issues.

Let me fill you in on another little secret, the issues of steroids are local issues and nothing the NF has jurisdiction over. My state has already taken some action as it relates to steroids and might institute some kind of testing.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 11:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
My state has already taken some action as it relates to steroids and might institute some kind of testing.
NJ has been testing for 2 years.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 24, 2007, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,226
kurt,

for your offense, do you have 5 guys with "lineman type" bodies in there, or do you have 11 skill guys in there at all times?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 24, 2007, 12:12pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossman72
kurt,

for your offense, do you have 5 guys with "lineman type" bodies in there, or do you have 11 skill guys in there at all times?
So O linemen don't have any skill?
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 24, 2007, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
misc

Dear Officials:

(I had to copy most of this from my post on another forum cause I am dealing with many requests and it saves time)

* About the OL question. Yes, we use OL in the Middle Box (3) players much of the time, TE's too. And, if some OL do not play that much in the A-11, we also switched them to DL and LB, they loved it and it made us even better too.


**Over the past week, I have received some very nice emails and phone calls from your Officiating Peers nationwide who wish to remain Anonymous (for now) but are actively viewing and/or participating in this online forum and others forums on the net.

Please let me summarize their key points as they have asked me to do, fair enough? Some of this will be familair ground.

1. High School football rules do not have to be the exact same as NCAA or NFL, never have and never will. For public high schools, talent level is a crap shoot from year to year.

2. The A-11 Offense is a fair and just innovation of the game, and has already undergone diligent review prior to this season

3. Thousands of high school offensive football teams nationwide already spread out the Defense by their alignment, and then shift/cover/uncover Eligible Numbered WR/TE/RB to pressure and force the Defense to respect "potential threats downfield."

4. The A-11 does the same thing as those other offensive systems who operate as above in terms of making it hard on the Defense to determine who is or is not Eligible on a given play

5. The A-11 does not give Piedmont an unfair advantage over other teams. Piedmont's 7 - 4 overall record in 2007 is direct testimony to that. A good season but not dominating by any means.

6. The actual Officiating Crews who worked Piedmont's games in 2007 handled everything fine in various parts of California, with or without advance knowledge of the A-11. The game is ever-changing and it is up to the Officials to adapt

7. And, this point has been stressed by several coaches and Officials who have contacted us, and is the primary reason the A-11 was developed in the first place.....It gives smaller, (espescially) public schools a better chance to compete vs. the larger schools and/or private schools they must play, which makes the games more competitive and is better for high school athletics.

8. Lastly, the A-11 was well received on many different fronts which is good for the game, while understanding not everybody would be happy about it. That is a fact of life.

Thanks again.

Kurt
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 24, 2007, 04:11pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,582
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
1. High School football rules do not have to be the exact same as NCAA or NFL, never have and never will. For public high schools, talent level is a crap shoot from year to year.
You are right, but often the rules do change to what happens at the other levels. That is just how it works. Welcome to the world of HS sports. When the pro and college rules try something and it works, they tend to bring it down to the HS level.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
2. The A-11 Offense is a fair and just innovation of the game, and has already undergone diligent review prior to this season
I really do not know what that means. And that is why the fumbleruskie was outlawed too (and other plays like the "where is my ball play").

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
3. Thousands of high school offensive football teams nationwide already spread out the Defense by their alignment, and then shift/cover/uncover Eligible Numbered WR/TE/RB to pressure and force the Defense to respect "potential threats downfield."
You are right, but it often does not work very well. Most of the successful HS programs where I live mostly run the football or run an option style or wing type offense. It does not mean there are not some successful pass offenses, they just need a good QB to run it or it is a flop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
4. The A-11 does the same thing as those other offensive systems who operate as above in terms of making it hard on the Defense to determine who is or is not Eligible on a given play
Actually it does not. You are using one part of the rule to confuse the defense in knowing who is going to do what. Whether you like it or not that might be seen as unfair and might be soon outlawed. Keep pumping it up and it will soon be outlawed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
5. The A-11 does not give Piedmont an unfair advantage over other teams. Piedmont's 7 - 4 overall record in 2007 is direct testimony to that. A good season but not dominating by any means.
It might be unfair, but it is legal. And the two things do not always have to match. Once again, it might be outlawed soon if someone feels this is a potential problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
6. The actual Officiating Crews who worked Piedmont's games in 2007 handled everything fine in various parts of California, with or without advance knowledge of the A-11. The game is ever-changing and it is up to the Officials to adapt
The issue is not just about the officials, it is if the rules committee feels there is an unbalance in favor of the offense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
7. And, this point has been stressed by several coaches and Officials who have contacted us, and is the primary reason the A-11 was developed in the first place.....It gives smaller, (especially) public schools a better chance to compete vs. the larger schools and/or private schools they must play, which makes the games more competitive and is better for high school athletics.
Just because coaches have asked you about it, does not mean it will not be made illegal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
8. Lastly, the A-11 was well received on many different fronts which is good for the game, while understanding not everybody would be happy about it. That is a fact of life.
Once again, this is not something you get to decide. And if you keep talking about it on this website, someone might be trying to find a way to make it illegal. You already have one coach complaining on another site about it. Just because coaches think it is great; do not be surprised if some are behind the scenes contacting their local people to outlaw this offense as it relates to the "scrimmage kick" portion of the rules.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/40451-a11-offense-11-potentially-eligible-receivers.html
Posted By For Type Date
1st Batch of A-11 Video (Thanks to Coach Huey)! This thread Refback Wed Nov 21, 2012 01:48pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A-11 Offense ?? TXMike Football 203 Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:43pm
Illegal sub or partic. on the Receivers BoBo Football 15 Mon Oct 24, 2005 09:35am
Such a potentially great resource bossref Basketball 36 Thu Oct 06, 2005 06:09pm
Eligible/Ineligible? WyMike Football 19 Fri Oct 22, 2004 03:43pm
Elgible Receivers Snappenhaggle Football 8 Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:16am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1