Indy/SD

[Barcelona]

What I haven´t seen here is this:
Referee announced that ruling on the field was interception and then IW. However, that whistle wasn´t inadventent, it happened because of bad judgement and it was an incomplete pass call.
Yeah, those guys made it clever and they "internally ruled it over" to IW, but wasn´t it so, that the call was incomplete pass and to change in, there should be a challenge (if that play is challengeable)?
Because next time, on officials make a mistake for example on sideline catch and rules oob catch, there could be also an "IW" on a catch.

[HLin NC]

Isn't it a Fed mechanic to beanbag the spot on an IW? What about the NFL?

[Forksref]

Originally Posted by HLin NC

Isn't it a Fed mechanic to beanbag the spot on an IW? What about the NFL?

Definitely bean bag it.

[Bob M.]

Originally Posted by Barcelona

What I haven´t seen here is this:
Referee announced that ruling on the field was interception and then IW. However, that whistle wasn´t inadventent, it happened because of bad judgement and it was an incomplete pass call.
Yeah, those guys made it clever and they "internally ruled it over" to IW, but wasn´t it so, that the call was incomplete pass and to change in, there should be a challenge (if that play is challengeable)?
Because next time, on officials make a mistake for example on sideline catch and rules oob catch, there could be also an "IW" on a catch.

REPLY: If you listen to Pereira's description and if you watch/here the video, you see that the call was not incomplete pass, but rather that the Colts defender was down (ball dead) when he hit the ground after completing the interception. If you watch the video, the S who whistled is coming into the endzone, but he is not signalling incomplete.