![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
Perhaps they were ruling it illegal batting or illegal kicking. Not that I agree with it but that's the only way that I could see them marking off a 15 yard penalty and that would be the proper enforcement. But then team B would just decline the penalty to avoid a replay of the down.
|
|
|||
neutral zone
I can see and like Jason, not necessarily agree with, an illegal batting/kicking. Those acts have to be intentional, and I am not sure this play has that. As for the touching, it appears to me that the first touching would be ignored because it happened in the expanded neutral zone. That being said, the ball does eventually get touched beyond the neutral zone, and touching precedes control, therefore the ball is dead at the spot whether that spot is in the EZ or field of play. A scrimmage kick by K that ends up being dead not in possesion is awarded to R. So the short answer is I agree, it should have been awarded to R most likely around the 2 or 3 yard line.
__________________
The officials lament, or the coaches excuses as it were: "I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you" |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Partially Blocked Field Goal - Pro Rules | 5 sport ref | Football | 1 | Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:34pm |
neutral zone | garwood8499 | Football | 5 | Sat Sep 02, 2006 04:01pm |
Blocked Field Goal | schoony | Football | 28 | Sat Oct 22, 2005 03:02pm |
Field goal attempts that hit the cameras on field goal posts | Barney72 | Football | 3 | Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:21pm |
Blocked field goal in Super Bowl | 101562 | Football | 1 | Tue Feb 01, 2000 10:36pm |