|
|||
Confused about 1-point safeties...
Team A try. Let's just say for some stupid reason, Quarterback A6 runs all the way back to A's goalline, where he falls down.
Is this a 1-point or 2-point safety awarded to Team B? |
|
|||
Quote:
NCAA rules are different though.
__________________
Bob M. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
OK OK, I got it. For some reason I was thinking that Team B had secured possession with an interception.
If A, on a try, were to fumble at B's 3 yard line, and B66, while attempting to recover the fumble, FORCED it into the endzone where it was recovered by Team B or knocked OOB in the endzone, a 1-point safety would be awarded to Team A. Got ya. Under that scenario, I know it's a 1-point safety awarded to Team A. I don't know why I was thinking B had secured possession with an interception. Now if A had recovered the fumble in B's endzone, it'd be 2-points for Team A, correct? Can someone answer my question about, in the NCAA, what would happen if A was tackled in their own endzone on a try? |
|
|||
Quote:
The word "force" as it pertains to NFHS rules is not a verb, it is a noun. The ball is never "forced." Paraphrasing the definition, force may result from the ball being batted, muffed, kicked, or passed. Now, one thing to keep in mind in your situation. A new force MAY result when a grounded ball is batted, muffed, or kicked. In your situation, we have to be 100% positive that B's force casued the ball to go from the field of play into the endzone (i.e. across the goal-line). If A fumbles the ball and it is rolling toward the end zone at a decent pace, and then B muffs the ball in the same direction, we are probably not going to rule that B's force caused the ball to cross the goal line. Then, depending on who recovers, we will rule accordingly. On the other hand, if the ball is nearly coming to a rest at the 3 yard line, and B muffs the ball, we can without doubt rule that B's force caused the ball to go from the field of play into the end zone. Then we will rule accordingly after one team gains possession. Make sense? We are not done with you on this play yet, though We have 6 potential situations to rule on here, so provide your ruling for the following: We have ruled A's force put the ball in the end zone and (1) a member of team A recovers the ball (2) a member of team B recovers the ball (3) the ball rolls out of bounds through the back of the end zone We have ruled B's force put the ball in the end zone and (4) a member of team A recovers the ball (5) a member of team B recovers the ball (6) the ball rolls out of bounds through the back of the end zone |
|
|||
I understand that force is a noun in the book's definition. I suppose I should have worded it, "Team B's FORCE put the ball into the end zone."
Anyway, thanks for helping me out. I'm learning a lot. Here's my attempt to answer your cases: 1. Team A is awarded two points, although I wonder if this is treated as if Team A had fumbled on fourth down and cannot advance the ball on a recovered fumble. If that's the case, the ball would be spotted from where Team A forced the ball into the endzone, and the try would be no good. 2. Team A's try is no good. 3. Same as if #2 occurred, Team A's try is no good. 4. 2-point touchdown awarded to Team A. 5. 1-point safety awarded to Team A. 6. 1-point safety awarded to Team A. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
However, since you asked.. NCAA rules, permit team-B to score during a TRY down either by running the ball into A's end zone or in your example, tackling a team-A player in his own end zone which of course would be extremely rare. |
|
|||
So if A has the ball, 4th and 5 on the 50, and fumbles at the 50, the ball rolls forward and out of bounds at Team B's 43 yard line, we have a first down for Team A at B's 43? Interesting. I'm surprised this isn't treated like the NCAA treats it.
And I'm assuming that A's force is what carries the ball past the line to gain. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confused | truerookie | Basketball | 2 | Thu Nov 24, 2005 02:44am |
Safeties on tries | Schultj | Football | 3 | Sat Aug 02, 2003 05:33pm |
?safeties on turnovers? | joeminnesota | Football | 4 | Tue Jul 29, 2003 08:35pm |
CONFUSED | rburn22281 | Basketball | 9 | Tue Apr 16, 2002 10:43am |
confused | Jeremy40 | Basketball | 31 | Thu Dec 06, 2001 09:42am |