![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
7.5.13 SITUATION A: Ineligible receiver A2 is in or behind his neutral zone when a forward pass by A1: (a) accidentally strikes him in the back; or (b) is muffed by him; or (c) is caught by him. RULING: In (a), there is no infraction, but in (b) and (c), it is illegal touching. The acts in both (b) and (c) are intentional and not accidental as in (a). |
|
|||
How about the enforcement?
Ok, so I biffed the interpretation of illegal touching. Let's say it was either (b) or (c) as yankeesfan pointed out. Would the enforcement be correct?
The coach didn't mention anything about situation (a) not being a penalty. He was upset at the enforcement of what he thought, like me, was a penalty. So would my enforcement be correct if it were muffed or caught by A60? Thanks. Thank you Rich and Yankeesfan. I had no idea there was any distinction between intent by the lineman the ball touched. You just saved me an even bigger butt-chewing down the road. :-) Last edited by foureyesallbad; Tue Oct 31, 2006 at 12:00am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but this seems like a pretty simple rule to understand and interperate. I know you said it was a JH game which is a good place to learn and gain experience, but was there no one else on the game that could help you and let you know that it was not a penalty?
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Illegal Touching | foureyesallbad | Football | 5 | Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:05am |
Possible illegal touching situation | kentref | Football | 4 | Wed Sep 21, 2005 01:51pm |
Illegal touching | Tundra Ref | Football | 4 | Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:52am |
Illegal Touching and OPI | mikesears | Football | 26 | Tue Jul 08, 2003 12:02pm |
Illegal touching: NF and NCAA. | Mike Simonds | Football | 4 | Fri Oct 11, 2002 01:26pm |