The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 05:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 147
[QUOTE=MJT]
Quote:
Originally Posted by parepat

Those are almost funny. All 4 officials who responded giving their opinion said to flag it.

Yes, excessive, just as HLin NC said. It does depend on how close the defender is, but you are asking for more trouble if you let it go unless you are pretty sure he did it cuz he thought he might be tackled. This is what causes the other team to retaliate and bad crap may start to happen.

The TD will still count, but the try will be 15 yards further back and the kid will know he should not be so self-centered next time.

BTW, how many times does a player, running at full speed near the goal line, get tackled from behind and not make it in the EZ. He is going to end up in the EZ anyway. The dive is fine if trying to beat a defender to the goal line, but not if you have them behind you and you are right at the goal line.

Along those same lines...if A-82 is going in for a TD on a long pass reception and holds the ball back to B45 who is in chase starting at the 5 yard line, do you flag and assess the penalty from the start of the taunting or do you toss the flag in the end zone and mark it off on the try?

My first impression is that you'd asses it from the 5, but that seems a bit excessive to wipe out a sure score for the sake of taunting.

Don't have the rule book handy and this just popped into my head as I read through this thread. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 06:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25
Sloth

It doesn't matter if you flag it on the five or in the endzone. The TD will still count. This is an usportsmanlike conduct penalty which will be enforced from the succeeding spot. The TD counts and enforce the penalty on the try. Also remember an UC can not combine to form a double foul or a multiple foul. All UC will be enforced at the succeeding spot.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 58
I attended a college game Saturday night. A kid returned a punt for a touchdown. He was well ahead of K pursuing him and dived into the EZ, which drew a flag from the R. Then the kid proceeded to run past the opposing bench taunting them as he ran by, drawing a second USC flag.

Then I loved what the R said when he got on the mic " There are two dead-ball unsportsmanlike conduct fouls on number 21 of the return team. He has therefore disqualified himself from the game. The penalties will both be assessed on the kickoff."

After the successful try from the 3, they kicked off from their own 10 after the two USCs were marched off.

I'm a Fed guy and not real familiar with college rules so I'm not sure if this all was right, but I liked the R indicating that the player had disqualified himself and not that he was just ejected or we ejected him.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 02:22pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie
I attended a college game Saturday night. A kid returned a punt for a touchdown. He was well ahead of K pursuing him and dived into the EZ, which drew a flag from the R. Then the kid proceeded to run past the opposing bench taunting them as he ran by, drawing a second USC flag.

Then I loved what the R said when he got on the mic " There are two dead-ball unsportsmanlike conduct fouls on number 21 of the return team. He has therefore disqualified himself from the game. The penalties will both be assessed on the kickoff."

After the successful try from the 3, they kicked off from their own 10 after the two USCs were marched off.

I'm a Fed guy and not real familiar with college rules so I'm not sure if this all was right, but I liked the R indicating that the player had disqualified himself and not that he was just ejected or we ejected him.

2 USC = ejection in a FED game, too.

And he would've drawn them from me.

A dive like that into the end zone withnobody within 5 yards? Flag. Everytime.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 02:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: In the play you originally described (runner five yards ahead of the pursuing B players), I would flag it--no question. Clearly nothing more than an attempt to focus attention on himself.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 03:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
Sounds good to me Opie.
Had a JV (NCAA) intersquad game yesterday where a blocked TRY was returned 97 yards for an apparent score but the team-B player dove in from about the 3 yard line for his UC foul.

I'm sure his coach let him know later, but the poor guy didn't get credit for the score because one of his not so smart team-B players committed a block in the back about 10 yards behind him when he was around the 20. Dumbest time for block if I ever saw one. He had a clear lane for the score without the block.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taunting rainmaker Basketball 18 Thu Jan 26, 2006 05:49pm
Taunting toolsoh Basketball 15 Thu Nov 18, 2004 01:56pm
Taunting Buckeyes Football 3 Tue Aug 10, 2004 12:42am
Taunting? Or What? rainmaker Basketball 6 Wed Feb 06, 2002 10:05pm
Taunting PeteBooth Football 3 Thu Dec 20, 2001 05:16pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1