Coin Toss Options

[glyphrunner]

Tonight, we had a very interesting, while absurd, situation happen on the coin toss (and subsequent second half options).

Ref: "Home, you've won the toss. You have the option of kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "We'll defer and defend that goal" (indicating the west goal).

Ref: "You only get one choice right now; kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "Ok, we'll defend that goal" (once again indicating the west goal).

Ref: "Visiting captain, you have the option to kick or receive."

Visitor Captain: "We'll receive."

Ref: "Home captain, you'll be kicking from the west end and it will be white choice in the second half."

Both teams shake hands and go off to their sidelines. No qualms or questions at all. Then, when we're giving the options for the second half, Home Captain insists that they get to receive the ball even though Visitor Captain has already stated their desire to receive the ball. For some reason, the Home coach also insists that it should be their ball to begin the second half.

I know we did this correctly, but I just had to share the fact that there are still some people out there that don't understand that you don't always get to receive the second half if the other team received in the first half.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by glyphrunner

Tonight, we had a very interesting, while absurd, situation happen on the coin toss (and subsequent second half options).

Ref: "Home, you've won the toss. You have the option of kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "We'll defer and defend that goal" (indicating the west goal).

Ref: "You only get one choice right now; kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "Ok, we'll defend that goal" (once again indicating the west goal).

Ref: "Visiting captain, you have the option to kick or receive."

Visitor Captain: "We'll receive."

Ref: "Home captain, you'll be kicking from the west end and it will be white choice in the second half."

Both teams shake hands and go off to their sidelines. No qualms or questions at all. Then, when we're giving the options for the second half, Home Captain insists that they get to receive the ball even though Visitor Captain has already stated their desire to receive the ball. For some reason, the Home coach also insists that it should be their ball to begin the second half.

I know we did this correctly, but I just had to share the fact that there are still some people out there that don't understand that you don't always get to receive the second half if the other team received in the first half.

Allowing a team, at ANY level, to screw up the coin toss is unnecessary and is usually a case of a WH saying "look how smart I am."

I ask if the team wants to defer to the second half, receive, ....and then I pause long enough for the captain to answer in one of the two choices that are picked in 99.9999999% of the games out there.

At the freshman/JV level I will say "defer, receive, and the other two choices will make your coach angry."

[BoomerSooner]

I would argue that all the choices should be given. I've had coaches want to wind in 2nd and 4th quarters and the only way to achieve that goal is to choose which end to defend in both halves. Of course I've also had a team choose to defend one end and the other choose to kick. This is something that must be coached and is reason to pick captains with some amount of intelligence or at least ones with ability to follow intructions.

[TXMike]

Originally Posted by glyphrunner

Tonight, we had a very interesting, while absurd, situation happen on the coin toss (and subsequent second half options).

Ref: "Home, you've won the toss. You have the option of kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "We'll defer and defend that goal" (indicating the west goal).

Ref: "You only get one choice right now; kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "Ok, we'll defend that goal" (once again indicating the west goal).

Ref: "Visiting captain, you have the option to kick or receive."

Visitor Captain: "We'll receive."

Ref: "Home captain, you'll be kicking from the west end and it will be white choice in the second half."

I know we did this correctly,.

No you didn't. At somepoint before declaring the choice final, the R shuld have specifically said, "if you make that choice then it is highly likely you will NOT be receiving the kickoff in the 2d half either. Do you still want to do this?"

[SouthGARef]

It was VERY clear, according to what you have said, that what the captain WANTED to do was defer his option to the second half. So instead of running that route, having a good clean game, and having no coaches pissed about the situation, your R decided to be technical in order to show off how smart he was.

Once again, it was clear in this situation that the player wanted to defer. Don't be a smarty pants.

[Ref inSoCA]

Originally Posted by glyphrunner

Tonight, we had a very interesting, while absurd, situation happen on the coin toss (and subsequent second half options).

Ref: "Home, you've won the toss. You have the option of kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "We'll defer and defend that goal" (indicating the west goal).

Ref: "You only get one choice right now; kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half."

Home Captain: "Ok, we'll defend that goal" (once again indicating the west goal).

Ref: "Visiting captain, you have the option to kick or receive."

Visitor Captain: "We'll receive."

Ref: "Home captain, you'll be kicking from the west end and it will be white choice in the second half."

Both teams shake hands and go off to their sidelines. No qualms or questions at all. Then, when we're giving the options for the second half, Home Captain insists that they get to receive the ball even though Visitor Captain has already stated their desire to receive the ball. For some reason, the Home coach also insists that it should be their ball to begin the second half.

I know we did this correctly, but I just had to share the fact that there are still some people out there that don't understand that you don't always get to receive the second half if the other team received in the first half.

A way to avoid this, and the way it's done here is:

Toss the coin. To the winner say: *** you've won the toss. Do you want to make your choice now or defer the second half?

If he says "defer" then the loser will usually say " we want the ball" before you can ask him.

Don't make officiating harder than it already is.

[Forksref]

At the varsity level I give the four choices and let them decide. I constantly tell coaches to teach their kids that unless there are very poor weather conditions, that they should either receive or defer. I don't think we need to coddle the kids at that level. At lower levels I explain the consequences of their choice. You can easily spot the well-coached teams because their captains are prepared for the coin toss options.

[TXMike]

They are not taking the SAT test out there..there is nothing wrong with giving them whatever help is needed to prevent an error. It take no extra effort and should cause you no extra difficulty to make it clear to the KID (and that is what they are, KIDS) what is choice will yield. Maybe it has been a long time since you were in their shoes but at that point in the game, many kids are so cranked up they have a hard time thinking straight. How does it hurt anything to help them out???

[RoyGardner]

IMO the R should have taken the original choice and clarified it. It would have eliminated any confusion. The R repeating the list of four options after it's clear there is some confusion borders on arrogant. I really don't care that according to the rules he is "technically correct".

After two of these instances in key game 3 years ago, our R's now ask the team winning the coin flip "Do you want to exercise your option now, or defer to the 2nd half?" There's only one "choice" here and that's now/defer. If they say defer, then option is offered to the other team and that is started off by R clearly saying they have deferred their option to the 2nd half, you have the option for the first half ......

Once the winning team indicates defer, we ignore the rest and of the response and pass the option to the other team. The coach clearly told the player something like "If we win toss, we want to defer, and defend the North goal." If we take that response to mean the team is using it's option to defend a goal, shame on us. It's our job to get it right, and I have no interest in showing the coach how "technically well we know the rules".

[RoyGardner]

Additionally, the R's response "You only get one choice right now; kick, receive, defend a goal, or defer to the second half." is very misleading.

When a team defers it will in most cases get a 2nd choice. When team 2 uses the option to receive, team 1 then has a 2nd option to decide end of field to defend. Let's not be "smart", let's be fair.

[JasonTX]

I had a game once where the captain said they wanted to kick. I made him well aware that if he kicks then he'll most likely kick to start the second half as well. He assured me that is what his coach said. It turns out he was right. This team liked playing defense. The coach was a defensive minded coach and wanted them to set the tone for the game. Since then I will now talk with the captains on the sideline, as will the umpire, about coin toss options. If the captains are confused they can consult with their coach prior to going out for the toss.

[RonRef]

Originally Posted by JasonTX

I had a game once where the captain said they wanted to kick. I made him well aware that if he kicks then he'll most likely kick to start the second half as well. He assured me that is what his coach said. It turns out he was right. This team liked playing defense. The coach was a defensive minded coach and wanted them to set the tone for the game. Since then I will now talk with the captains on the sideline, as will the umpire, about coin toss options. If the captains are confused they can consult with their coach prior to going out for the toss.

Is he still the coach...seems kind of stupid to let the other team get the ball both halves. Is his name Dave Wannstadt (former Bears coach)?

[glyphrunner]

Originally Posted by RonRef

Is he still the coach...seems kind of stupid to let the other team get the ball both halves. Is his name Dave Wannstadt (former Bears coach)?

A touch judgemental here, without knowing that team's strength. Perhaps their defense is their primary scorer? Perhaps they know that their defense is strong enough to pin and hold the opponent deep in their own end?

[RonRef]

Originally Posted by glyphrunner

A touch judgemental here, without knowing that team's strength. Perhaps their defense is their primary scorer? Perhaps they know that their defense is strong enough to pin and hold the opponent deep in their own end?

glyphrunner, it is called humor, try it sometime!

[JasonTX]

Originally Posted by RonRef

Is he still the coach...seems kind of stupid to let the other team get the ball both halves. Is his name Dave Wannstadt (former Bears coach)?

They did exactly as they planned. Stopped the offense and got the ball right back in good field position. Apparently they figured they'd get better field position on defense than they would with a kickoff return. The coach must be doing something right cause they went on to win the state championship in Texas that year and they are number 1 in the polls this year as well.