The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 16, 2006, 08:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 147
I wanted to give this thread a big old bump for my white hat who frequents this site.

We had a spirited discussion during halftime of our game last night (which was televised as the game of the week...very cool experience seeing yourself on TV). The crew maintained that you can't break the huddle with 12 players. I insisted that was an NCAA rule and that in federation the simple act of breaking the huddle with over 11 players isn't a penalty itself nor is it automatically a substitution infraction. I understand the concerns of a replaced player not leaving the field in a timely fashion; but furthering a misnomer, that most all coaches hold about the rules, only serves to make our job harder.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 07:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: sloth...you're correct and your crew needs to get on the right page with this: There is only one foul that might be called in this type of situation. It is simply for failure of a replaced player to leave the field 'immediately' after being informed that he's been replaced. There is no Federation foul specifically specified for breaking the huddle with twelve players. There is in NCAA, but not in Federation! So if a substitute enters a huddle just before they are about to break and as the huddle breaks, the replaced player heads off to his sideline and off the field, there is no foul!
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
12 men breaking huddle

In general, this is a judgement call regarding the "immediately". Our association prefers we flag them as a substitution violation, rather than have it develop into a participation violation. If I hear the sub tell 62 Jones "you're out" and Jones is having a brain fart, I'm cutting them some slack on the "immediately".
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 18, 2006, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 1,464
an acceptable time for "immediate" is 3 to 5 seconds.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 19, 2006, 06:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 147
I agree with the 3 to 5 second window. I think it really is up to the white hat to watch the situation and make the call based on his opinion as to what "immediate" is considered.

I really don't want to give coaches that easially quantifable criteria if its wrong. Thats where I think as officials we ALWAYS need to avoid the term "breaking the huddle with 12 players". Its not the rule, and while the spirit of the federation rule is very similar, its not the same absolute cut and dry measurement as to if a foul has occured. There is that discression allowed to the referee to let it pass if it wasn't intended to gain an advantage or deliberate in nature.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30 Sec Time out huddle dhanders Basketball 2 Sun Nov 20, 2005 12:20pm
Breaking the Huddle w/12??? BoBo Football 6 Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:55am
12 men in the huddle dallas Football 15 Mon Sep 27, 2004 02:04pm
1:00 Huddle coachgrd Basketball 9 Fri Dec 19, 2003 07:54pm
13 men in the huddle lawref Football 3 Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:04pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1