Flaw in rules?

Originally posted by Texas Aggie
You still wouldn't start the clock on the RFP in NCAA after an offensive DOG in this situation. NCAA 3-4-3 is a "shall" rule, and DOG is an "obviously unfair" tactic, as is any rule infraction.

Obviously, we are talking in terms of late game, Team A ahead situtions. Other situations may call for different standards of "obviously unfair" and "shall" be administered equitably in their own regard.

I agree

[Texas Aggie]

Of course, the Florida Supreme Court in the Bush/Gore decision said that a conflict in statutes, involving the words "shall" and "may", would be resolved by substituting "can't."

My post assumes the NCAA doesn't follow such so-called "logic!"

Originally posted by Texas Aggie
Of course, the Florida Supreme Court in the Bush/Gore decision said that a conflict in statutes, involving the words "shall" and "may", would be resolved by substituting "can't."

My post assumes the NCAA doesn't follow such so-called "logic!"

LOL, I work NFHS rules but that is a good one!