The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 31, 2005, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 55
Picture this scenario: K punts striaght up or very short. R, believing he is beyond the neutral zone, signals and makes a fair catch actually behind the neutral zone. All players of K stop because they assume he is in or beyond the neutral zone and made a fair catch. R, believing the same thing, walks over and hands the ball to the nearest official. If the ball is still alive at that point according to your interpretation the covering official would have to not take the ball and let it fall to the ground still a live ball which you would have to rule a fumble. Doubtful anyone would notice no wistle was blown. What a mess.

If someone gives a fair catch signal, it is either valid according to the definition of a valid fair catch signal. Invalid is everything else. It HAS to be valid or invalid. It can't be a nothing. So back to the fundmental statement that the ball is dead following a valid or invalid signal.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1