Wed Jan 12, 2005, 03:07pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 169
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by JasonTX
Quote:
Originally posted by Middleman
The impetus that put the ball in the end zone for A12's fumble was the blocked kick, not B's muff. After B muffed the ball back into the end zone, there was no second fumble. If, under the 4th down fumble rule, the ball cannot be advanced and comes back to the spot of the fumble, the result would be a safety.
|
Blocking of a kick does not change impetus. Check out NCAA rule 8-7-2. Impetus is charged to the player who kicks, passes, snaps, or fumbles, or contacts a ball at rest. [/B]
|
Exactly. Team B was NOT responsible for putting the ball in the end zone prior to A12's fumble.
Safety.
|
Hybrid Mode
