The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
In this question and answer isn't guard A78 beyond the expanded neutral zone when he catches this pass?

Play Situation 6
Immediately after spending their last time out, A has the ball at the 24 yard line of B, trailing by four points on second down and 7 with three seconds remaining in the game. Quarterback A12 under heavy pressure intends to throw a desperation pass to the end zone but is off balance on his release. The forward pass instead sails high, untouched in the air towards the neutral zone where offensive guard A78 catches it at B's twenty yard line and advances beyond B's goal line.

Play Situation 6 answer
This is a strange one, but it has happened! Rule 7-5-13 tells us that it is illegal touching if an ineligible A player touches a forward pass in or behind the neutral zone and B has not first touched it.
In order for the touchdown to be nullified B must accept the 5 yard, loss of down penalty. Since the clock has expired on the play, A will be awarded an untimed down because of the accepted penalty rule 3-3-3a. It will be third and twelve for A at the B 29 yard line.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 10:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Yes, what's your point though?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
My point I guess is that, isn't it offensive pass interferance and not the ruling listed
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
I'm a relative newbie, so think I'll take a crack.
It is not pass intereference as the ineligible is in or behind the neutral zone. Now if the ineligible is beyond the neutral zone, I am thinking it is OPI and would also be ineligible downfield.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 461
Send a message via AIM to jumpmaster Send a message via MSN to jumpmaster Send a message via Yahoo to jumpmaster
Texoma you're thinking the right way

If the ball is touched by an ineligible down field it is OPI (FED 7-5-10b)

If the ball is not touched by an ineligible, then you merely have an ineligible down field (FED 7-5-12)

--
My3sons, this rule 7-5-13 is the correct ruling in the play provided in Mr. Hayes article.
__________________
Alan Roper

Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here - CPT John Parker, April 19, 1775, Lexington, Mass
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
In this play if A78 is beyond the neutral zone. Then 7-5-10b applies. No B player has touched the ball, wouldn't that be pass interferance. I am going by Table 7-5. Just trying to understand this rule.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,557
It is OPI beyond the neutral zone, illegal touching in or behind.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
In the situation, A78 was beyond the expanded neutral zone. Therefore, the correct call is OPI. A would have 3rd and 22 from B's 39 for one untimed down.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 461
Send a message via AIM to jumpmaster Send a message via MSN to jumpmaster Send a message via Yahoo to jumpmaster
Quote:
Originally posted by my3sons
...The forward pass instead sails high, untouched in the air towards the neutral zone where offensive guard A78 catches it at B's twenty yard line and advances beyond B's goal line...
I read this statement as the ball is caught in or behind the neutral zone. I believe that is Mr. Hayes intent.

Why not send him a note? His email is posted at the bottom of the article.
__________________
Alan Roper

Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here - CPT John Parker, April 19, 1775, Lexington, Mass
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: De Pere WI
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally posted by jumpmaster
Quote:
Originally posted by my3sons
...The forward pass instead sails high, untouched in the air towards the neutral zone where offensive guard A78 catches it at B's twenty yard line and advances beyond B's goal line...
I read this statement as the ball is caught in or behind the neutral zone. I believe that is Mr. Hayes intent.

Why not send him a note? His email is posted at the bottom of the article.

Sounds like A78 caught past the NZ..... LOS =24 he catches at 20? OPI in my opinion. BTW, does the rule include the ENZ, or just the NZ for OPI versus touching?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 12:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally posted by jumpmaster
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by my3sons
[B]...where offensive guard A78 catches it at B's twenty yard line


I read this statement as the ball is caught in or behind the neutral zone. I believe that is Mr. Hayes intent.
How is it caught in or behind the neutral zone when it clearly states B's 20 yard line?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 01:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
I sent an e-mail to Darin a couple of days ago. I am waiting for his reply.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 02:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Clinton Township, NJ
Posts: 2,065
REPLY: As written, this is OPI. And to answer a question posed above, it is OPI if an ineligible A player touches a forward pass beyond the neutral zone before a player of B has touched it.
__________________
Bob M.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 02:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 29
I agree. As written, this is OPI. 15 yards from previous spot, LOSS OF DOWN, and A gets one untimed down. Now - If this had been 4th down, would "A" get an untimed down, or would they have lost that right.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 06, 2004, 02:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally posted by KSRef
If this had been 4th down, would "A" get an untimed down, or would they have lost that right.
B would get one untimed down if this were the case.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1