The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 28, 2018, 10:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
Fair Catch signal question.

Case -

K team punts ball high in air.

Two return players are back deep.

R1 waves his arms side to side (penalty decline signal) telling teammates to get away from the kick.

R2 catches the ball of the bounce and returns it.

Is this illegal? What if R1 would have fielded it instead of R2?

Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 06:46am
CT1 CT1 is offline
Official & ***** Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,049
Once any member of the receiving team gives a FC signal (valid or invalid), the ball becomes dead upon possession, and cannot be advanced.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 08:59am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
There has been nothing at the NF level at least that suggests this is an invalid signal at all. Maybe your state has made some interpretation on the issue, which is allowed by them, but not from the NF level. This is a legal play and can advance the ball if someone picks up to return the punt on a scrimmage kick.

This is after all dead in college upon the recovery of the punt by R.

Different levels have different interpretations.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 09:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by CT1 View Post
Once any member of the receiving team gives a FC signal (valid or invalid), the ball becomes dead upon possession, and cannot be advanced.
Additionally, in FED, it's a 5-yard penalty to give an invalid (or illegal) signal.

And remember that R does not receive protection-it's not a fair catch.

We've been told here that it's the "get away" signal is invalid.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
Additionally, in FED, it's a 5-yard penalty to give an invalid (or illegal) signal.

And remember that R does not receive protection-it's not a fair catch.

We've been told here that it's the "get away" signal is invalid.
Do they say how high the hands have to be for that? Above the shoulders? Above the waist?

Just trying to figure out what kind of gesture they can make that won't be taken as a fair catch signal.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Do they say how high the hands have to be for that? Above the shoulders? Above the waist?

Just trying to figure out what kind of gesture they can make that won't be taken as a fair catch signal.
Once again (or maybe "Still") it's a matter of "common sense" on the part of the covering official, to DETERMINE if whatever "signal" was given was innocuous and immaterial, or misleading (and therefore Invalid).
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 01:01pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
Once again (or maybe "Still") it's a matter of "common sense" on the part of the covering official, to DETERMINE if whatever "signal" was given was innocuous and immaterial, or misleading (and therefore Invalid).
Yes, common sense should be used. But the problem is that the NCAA said that any signal, for the most part, would kill the play regardless of how the waive took place. And even in that situation the ruling from the NCAA is to just simply kill the play and not give a penalty. The NF has done no such thing, but states might have. So simply waving at shoulder length as if to say, "Getaway" was never illegal or considered an invalid signal. That is why it matters what the state you work in says or suggests and then move forward with that ruling. As usually things that start at other levels do not always come down to the other levels and people conflate the two issues.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 01:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Yes, common sense should be used. But the problem is that the NCAA said that any signal, for the most part, would kill the play regardless of how the waive took place. And even in that situation the ruling from the NCAA is to just simply kill the play and not give a penalty. The NF has done no such thing, but states might have. So simply waving at shoulder length as if to say, "Getaway" was never illegal or considered an invalid signal. That is why it matters what the state you work in says or suggests and then move forward with that ruling. As usually things that start at other levels do not always come down to the other levels and people conflate the two issues.

Peace
"Common Sense" suggests you actually know where you are (what State, operating under which Rules Code and what accepted practices are) that will help guide you to the appropriate conclusions.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 01:36pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
"Common Sense" suggests you actually know where you are (what State, operating under which Rules Code and what accepted practices are) that will help guide you to the appropriate conclusions.
I would suggest that is is not very "common" to know what is allowed or this would not keep coming up. Again people have used the NCAA situation to apply to the NF situation where it might not apply.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 05:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Yes, common sense should be used. But the problem is that the NCAA said that any signal, for the most part, would kill the play regardless of how the waive took place. And even in that situation the ruling from the NCAA is to just simply kill the play and not give a penalty. The NF has done no such thing, but states might have. So simply waving at shoulder length as if to say, "Getaway" was never illegal or considered an invalid signal. That is why it matters what the state you work in says or suggests and then move forward with that ruling. As usually things that start at other levels do not always come down to the other levels and people conflate the two issues.

Peace
The Case Book 6.5.7 SITUATION B seems to cover this type of action as invalid signal (case c):.....

During a scrimmage kick, R1 signals for a fair catch by: (a) extending and holding one arm above his head; or (b) partially extending and waving one hand in front of his face; or (c) fully extending and laterally waving both hands above his head or in front of the body without extending one hand at arm’s length above his head; or (d) extending and laterally waving one arm at full length above his head.

RULING: The signals in (a), (b) and (c) are invalid. In (d), the signal is valid. Giving an invalid signal is a foul for which the penalty is enforced under the post-scrimmage kick provision.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 29, 2018, 09:55pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUMP View Post
The Case Book 6.5.7 SITUATION B seems to cover this type of action as invalid signal (case c):.....

During a scrimmage kick, R1 signals for a fair catch by: (a) extending and holding one arm above his head; or (b) partially extending and waving one hand in front of his face; or (c) fully extending and laterally waving both hands above his head or in front of the body without extending one hand at arm’s length above his head; or (d) extending and laterally waving one arm at full length above his head.

RULING: The signals in (a), (b) and (c) are invalid. In (d), the signal is valid. Giving an invalid signal is a foul for which the penalty is enforced under the post-scrimmage kick provision.
Plays a, b, and c are basically above the head or at the head. Not exactly what we are talking about here. The play in question is at shoulder or below shoulder length. I am not sure that is what we are talking about if the "waving" is in front of your face. And I have never seen anyone suggest give a penalty for the "get away" signal that is often used in these situations. Never has been the case in my over 20 years of officiating.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 30, 2018, 11:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Play (c) most certainly is not only talking about signals at or above the head.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 30, 2018, 11:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Do they say how high the hands have to be for that? Above the shoulders? Above the waist?

Just trying to figure out what kind of gesture they can make that won't be taken as a fair catch signal.
Any waving kills the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 30, 2018, 10:27pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
Any waving kills the ball.
This play is suggesting this is a penalty. It is not just suggesting it just kills the play.

I'm sorry, but I have never heard that suggested.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
This play is suggesting this is a penalty. It is not just suggesting it just kills the play.

I'm sorry, but I have never heard that suggested.

Peace
I was responding to his inquiry about what we have been told in my area.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fair Catch signal john_faz Football 6 Mon Aug 30, 2010 01:34pm
Fair Catch Signal?? YellowFlag Football 4 Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:09am
Fair Catch Signal Samdog Football 18 Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:58pm
Fair Catch Signal jmctigerpaw Football 5 Tue Dec 23, 2003 09:54am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1