The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:31am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 130
Helmet To Helmet NFL Question

http://www.nfl.com/m/share?p=%2Fvide...y-for-key-sack

Should this have been penalized? The typically fan reaction is yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything.

The quarterback wasn't defenseless in the typical sense, unless he's considered defenseless by rule in this situation.

Seeking some clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerUmp View Post
T.J. Watt barrels down on Brett Hundley for key sack - NFL Videos

Should this have been penalized? The typically fan reaction is yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything. The quarterback wasn't defenseless in the typical sense, unless he's considered defenseless by rule in this situation.

Seeking some clarification.
If you want to debate the definition (much less the understanding) of the word defenseless KNOCK YOURSELF OUT (but you might find a willing tree stump first). The NFL, as well as other levels of football recognize and accept all "helmet contact" as both inevitable and problematic and want to minimize it as much as possible.

When Illegal Helmet Contact fouls (Spearing, Butt-Block, Face Tackle) were initiated, a seriously considered alternative of "removing facemasks" was a possibility if the Contact Fouls proved ineffective.

Up to that point, dangerous techniques were acceptable AND BEING TAUGHT AND ENCOURAGED and it was decided needed to be STOPPED.

At the interscholastic level, for the express purpose "to minimize risk" the "pop-up" free kick was deemed illegal (in the hope it will cease being taught).

Creating and subsequently expanding the definition of "Defenseless Player" is simply the latest step in minimizing helmet contacts, it may not be the last.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:45pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 130
Quote:
To clarify the hit on Hundley, a "passer" is not the QB, but a player in the act of passing. Even though in the pocket, he's not a defenseless player, especially since he's trying evade tackles and gain yards. There are QB protections, but none of those were violated on this play
The above is a Football Zebras tweet.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 27, 2017, 07:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerUmp View Post
The above is a Football Zebras tweet.
Actually, "FormerUmp" it depends on which rules code the game is being played under. NFHS 2-23-16 defines "a defenseless player is a player who, because of his physical position and focus of concentration, is especially vulnerable to injury. A player who initiates contact with a defenseless player IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING LEGAL CONTACT. When in question, a player is defenseless."

(examples of defenseless players include...

a. A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass;"

As with so many aspects of what officials do, informed judgment of what they are specifically observing is a major component of any judgment rendered. Other rule codes may likely impact those decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 27, 2017, 07:50pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
He is not a passer in NF Rules or NCAA Rules for that matter. A runner is not considered by rule a defenseless player in either code unless they are being held up or under control by a defender. This was not the case.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 30, 2017, 10:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
He is not a passer in NF Rules or NCAA Rules for that matter. A runner is not considered by rule a defenseless player in either code unless they are being held up or under control by a defender. This was not the case. Peace
Don't know about NCAA, but under NFHS 2-23-16; defines "a defenseless player is a player who, because of his physical position and focus of concentration, is especially vulnerable to injury. A player who initiates contact with a defenseless player IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING LEGAL CONTACT. When in question, a player is defenseless."

Either being, "held up or under control by a defender" may factor in, or contribute to the decision, but neither is REQUIRED.

Last edited by ajmc; Thu Nov 30, 2017 at 10:55pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Targeting - Helmet to Helmet dvboa Football 37 Sun May 26, 2013 02:34pm
Helmet off question. bigjohn Football 12 Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:03am
Helmet to Helmet contact john_faz Football 12 Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:47pm
Lost Helmet Question doctord23 Football 4 Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:55pm
Allstar helmet, sizing question. thumpferee Baseball 3 Thu Apr 21, 2005 05:58am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1