![]() |
|
|||
Breaking through rule misconceptions
What do you do when you just can't get people to see it? They're blinded by misconception, what they think the rule should be, not what the rule actually is.
For example (NFHS Rules): B12 intercepts a pass in the end zone, tries to run it out but is tackled in the end zone. During the return, B49 blocks A89 in the back, in the end zone. Thee result is not a touchback and the penalty is not enforced from the 20. THe result of the play is a safety. But people can't be two rules together and arrive at the proper ruling. ![]()
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Stop worrying about it. I can only control myself and my crew. I do not have time to worry about what others want to do or cannot see.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
The result of the play, without the foul, is a touchback. Any foul by the team in possession that occurs in the team's end zone is governed by all but one enforcment. This is a foul by the offense! In the end zone.
10.4.4 Situation E is the closest I can find to a caseplay like this. The relevant rule is 10-5-4 All but one penalty enforcement and Safety/Touchback are difficult concepts that require study. But, all officials must thoroughly understand them if they want to work football games. See if a rule study group would work... you can't convince people if they arent willing to learn. Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
If that's the case and they're not willing to listen to reason, then JRut hit it right on the head.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Therein lies the difference between being ignorant, and stupid. Ignorance can be corrected and eliminated by simply providing the necessary additional information for clarification, and accepting it. Stupid is a whole different matter, and can last forever.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intentionally breaking a rule- USC or just stupid? | jmkupka | Softball | 6 | Mon Jun 26, 2017 03:59pm |
biggest misconceptions | Snake~eyes | Football | 60 | Wed Nov 02, 2005 06:21am |
Fed Misconceptions | grantsrc | Football | 22 | Fri Oct 07, 2005 09:25am |
Top Misconceptions for Youth Football | mikesears | Football | 24 | Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:12pm |
Deeply rooted misconceptions | just another ref | Basketball | 3 | Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:27am |