Breaking through rule misconceptions
What do you do when you just can't get people to see it? They're blinded by misconception, what they think the rule should be, not what the rule actually is.
For example (NFHS Rules): B12 intercepts a pass in the end zone, tries to run it out but is tackled in the end zone. During the return, B49 blocks A89 in the back, in the end zone. Thee result is not a touchback and the penalty is not enforced from the 20. THe result of the play is a safety. But people can't be two rules together and arrive at the proper ruling. :confused: |
Quote:
|
Stop worrying about it. I can only control myself and my crew. I do not have time to worry about what others want to do or cannot see.
Peace |
The result of the play, without the foul, is a touchback. Any foul by the team in possession that occurs in the team's end zone is governed by all but one enforcment. This is a foul by the offense! In the end zone.
10.4.4 Situation E is the closest I can find to a caseplay like this. The relevant rule is 10-5-4 All but one penalty enforcement and Safety/Touchback are difficult concepts that require study. But, all officials must thoroughly understand them if they want to work football games. See if a rule study group would work... you can't convince people if they arent willing to learn. Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Therein lies the difference between being ignorant, and stupid. Ignorance can be corrected and eliminated by simply providing the necessary additional information for clarification, and accepting it. Stupid is a whole different matter, and can last forever.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03am. |