The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed Mar 29, 2017, 01:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWH View Post
Again, there is no mystery or shroud of secrecy as only state associations members a rep from the Officials association and a rep from the coaches association make up the federation. In this situation, One (or more) of the member states "cared" and presented a Rule Proposal to not allow advertising on the ball. They defined advertising, it was voted on and adopted. Nothing more, nothing less.
But if they really cared, wouldn't they be more directly effective by getting their own state to adopt such a policy? Or their own league? Or their own school? Why should they care what advertising some other school, maybe across the country, puts on the balls they use? It doesn't affect the game itself.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Black pants: to press or not to press? sir_eldren Football 9 Sat Sep 03, 2011 09:55am
NFHS Rule Change Basketball Press Release Tim C Basketball 4 Fri May 07, 2010 12:33am
NFHS Press Release BillyMac Basketball 0 Tue May 08, 2007 06:43pm
ASA PRESS RELEASE: BANNED BATS !!!! ump57006 Softball 5 Sat Aug 03, 2002 11:40pm
NCAA Press Release for 2002-03 rules changes. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Basketball 38 Fri May 10, 2002 10:39am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1