The Official Forum
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Free Throw Shooter (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/99866-free-throw-shooter.html)

Raymond Thu Jun 11, 2015 09:17pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 963752)
Unless the NFHS was persuaded by Mr. Webb to interpret the new rule as ignoring such contact unless it's intentional.
The ball is still live, there is absolutely no rules basis for such an interpretation. Actually, it goes completely against the rules in regards to illegal contact during a live ball.

I'll continue with my correct interpretation of calling a foul. I don't follow IAABO interps.

jpgc99 Thu Jun 11, 2015 09:38pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 963770)
The ball is still live, there is absolutely no rules basis for such an interpretation. Actually, it goes completely against the rules in regards to illegal contact during a live ball.

I'll continue with my correct interpretation of a calling a foul. I don't follow IAABO interps.
To steal from JRut,

IAABO created this mess. Let them live with it.

BillyMac Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:50pm
We Can Always Hope ...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 963770)
I don't follow IAABO interps.
Unfortunately, I have to. Now that he's got his "interpretation" changed into an actual rule, perhaps Mr. Webb will now rethink his "intentional" interpretation, and bring it back a little.

Raymond Fri Jun 12, 2015 07:16am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 963770)
The ball is still live, there is absolutely no rules basis for such an interpretation. Actually, it goes completely against the rules in regards to illegal contact during a live ball.

I'll continue with my correct interpretation of calling a foul. I don't follow IAABO interps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 963778)
Unfortunately, I have to.....
Just remember that most of us do not, so you should quit asking us why IAABO passed such an interpretation. ;)

Adam Fri Jun 12, 2015 08:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 963752)
Unless the NFHS was persuaded by Mr. Webb to interpret the new rule as ignoring such contact unless it's intentional.
And unless they put it into a case play, or I get direction from my local IAABO board to do it that way, you won't find me treating contact with a FT shooter like it's dead ball contact.

BillyMac Fri Jun 12, 2015 04:26pm
NFHS Rulebook ...
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 963787)
... why IAABO passed such an interpretation.
Well, at least the "cross the line" IAABO interpretation is now part of the NFHS rule book, so I feel better about calling it, and teaching it. Hopefully the IAABO "intentional, or nothing" interpretation will go away.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44pm.
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1