The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 28, 2015, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCalScoreKeeper View Post
Anyone know when the 2015-2016 NFHS changes will be announced?
I was just wondering the same thing today.

I'm pretty sure the committee has already met and adjourned. I think it's just a matter of the editors gathering the results and generating a press release.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 845
I am just saying....

Who thinks there will be a rule about player in a marked lane space for a free throw that breaks the free throw line before the ball contacts the Rim or Backboard?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 29, 2015, 05:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoochy View Post
Who thinks there will be a rule about player in a marked lane space for a free throw that breaks the free throw line before the ball contacts the Rim or Backboard?
I've already gone on record that there will be because the IAABO guy on the committee wants to make himself retroactively correct.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 29, 2015, 05:54pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,404
IAABO Versus NFHS ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoochy View Post
Who thinks there will be a rule about player in a marked lane space for a free throw that breaks the free throw line before the ball contacts the Rim or Backboard?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I've already gone on record that there will be because the IAABO guy on the committee wants to make himself retroactively correct.
I thought so too, but this rule change was not on the agenda. Maybe it will be considered as an editorial change, or a clarification?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
I thought so too, but this rule change was not on the agenda. Maybe it will be considered as an editorial change, or a clarification?
Or one of those "unannounced" changes!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:58am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
I've already gone on record that there will be because the IAABO guy on the committee wants to make himself retroactively correct.
So we are going to be calling a lot of T's for dead ball contact since we have to call the violation first?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:48pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
So we are going to be calling a lot of T's for dead ball contact since we have to call the violation first?
Nope, the ball is still live (I know you know this) since it's a "delayed dead ball."
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:39pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Nope, the ball is still live (I know you know this) since it's a "delayed dead ball."
So we are conceivably going to give A1 a new shot for missed the free throw, then additional free throws for the foul. I prefer just to call the foul, but I'm flexible.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:56pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
So we are conceivably going to give A1 a new shot for missed the free throw, then additional free throws for the foul. I prefer just to call the foul, but I'm flexible.
Conceivably. By rule, if you call the foul, you're going to have to call the violation as well. I'm with you, but then again, just calling a couple of these violations will take care of the problem, too.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1