Ohio team loses H.S. state title after late hanging-on-the-rim technical foul

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by hbk314

Not really. There may be the occasional thread where I'm a little over the top, but sometimes they're learning experiences. ....

And that's when you get the fanboy designation. When you come to an officiating site and argue a JUDGMENT call (ie: UCLA/SMU) for the sole purpose of arguing, don't expect positive feedback. You go A LOT over the top whenever the majority of the opinions are opposite of what you believe to be true; that holds true especially in the football forum.

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

And that's when you get the fanboy designation. When you come to an officiating site and argue a JUDGMENT call (ie: UCLA/SMU) for the sole purpose of arguing, don't expect positive feedback. You go A LOT over the top whenever the majority of the opinions are opposite of what you believe to be true; that holds true especially in the football forum.

My argument in that case was based on what I observed and applying the rule as written to those observations. I wasn't over the top at all in that thread. Merely a difference of opinion.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by hbk314

My argument in that case was based on what I observed and applying the rule as written to those observations. I wasn't over the top at all in that thread. Merely a difference of opinion.

How about the thread for the Arizona v Wisconsin game in which you questioned what a crew discusses at halftime and stated that there were way more fouls called in the second half than the first half. When I provided the actual numbers (20 & 23) that proved you to be a liar, your only response was "grow up."
You were shown to be dead wrong and responded like a scolded teenager instead of an adult who desires to have a rational discussion about officiating issues. Here are two words for you "good riddance."

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

How about the thread for the Arizona v Wisconsin game in which you questioned what a crew discusses at halftime and stated that there were way more fouls called in the second half than the first half. When I provided the actual numbers (20 & 23) that proved you to be a liar, your only response was "grow up."
You were shown to be dead wrong and responded like a scolded teenager instead of an adult who desires to have a rational discussion about officiating issues. Here are two words for you "good riddance."

lol. A liar? Really? It certainly seemed that way watching the game, probably because at one point 14 of Arizona's last 16 points were from the line. How about you learn how to post without making personal attacks if you don't want to be told to grow up?

[JRutledge]

I have never seen great dunkers like Micheal Jordan, Dominque Wilkins, Darryl Dawkins or those from Phi Slamma Jamma have to hang on the rim that way to stop from falling. And this dunk was not contested or had a foul being called, but those athletic players did not need to do what this kid did and somehow never were in a hospital for a dunk.

Peace

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by hbk314

lol. A liar? Really? It certainly seemed that way watching the game, probably because at one point 14 of Arizona's last 16 points were from the line. How about you learn how to post without making personal attacks if you don't want to be told to grow up?

Still no acknowledgement that you were both wrong and over the top there. Two things that you keep claiming not to be on this forum.

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Still no acknowledgement that you were both wrong and over the top there. Two things that you keep claiming not to be on this forum.

I'd say that post was an acknowledgment that I was wrong. I've never claimed not to ever be wrong or over the top. Nice try though.