Blindolbat Might as well add the Block that was called with 6 seconds to go. Definitely think it's worth looking at again and discussing.
Raymond Blindolbat wroteMight as well add the Block that was called with 6 seconds to go. Definitely think it's worth looking at again and discussing. No, that was an easy block.
Blindolbat I had originally only seen the view from the side. Found the different view from the leads position and yes it's more clearly a block.
SNIPERBBB Blindolbat wroteI had originally only seen the view from the side. Found the different view from the leads position and yes it's more clearly a block. When watching live it looked like a charge. On the replay, defender just never came close to getting LGP.
APG SNIPERBBB wroteAngle on the one replay looks like possible BI. Can anyone get a better video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlFBqcHK2FY Blindolbat wroteMight as well add the Block that was called with 6 seconds to go. Definitely think it's worth looking at again and discussing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MZjV0WW3gc
just another ref Of course, by far the most obvious thing in either video is the spin move travel which David Hall encouraged us to get. But nobody got it.
Rich just another ref wroteOf course, by far the most obvious thing in either video is the spin move travel which David Hall encouraged us to get. But nobody got it. Just kills you, doesn't it? 😛
JRutledge Play #1: It does not look like a BI at all. Play #2: Sorry, but this looks like a charge to me. The player is not airborne at the time of contact and the player looks like he moved laterally. Peace
JRutledge just another ref wroteOf course, by far the most obvious thing in either video is the spin move travel which David Hall encouraged us to get. But nobody got it. Looks like he gathers the ball while both feet are in the air. It is not obvious to me and I would pass on it too. Peace
Camron Rust JRutledge wrote Play #2: Sorry, but this looks like a charge to me. The player is not airborne at the time of contact and the player looks like he moved laterally. Peace First contact was with the extended leg, for one. Second, I believe there was another angle (not included here) that showed the defender stepping forward into contact.
starmanhoops JRutledge wrotePlay #1: It does not look like a BI at all. Play #2: Sorry, but this looks like a charge to me. The player is not airborne at the time of contact and the player looks like he moved laterally. Peace Play #2: defender moves over and under late to my interpretation.
MechanicGuy JRutledge wroteLooks like he gathers the ball while both feet are in the air. It is not obvious to me and I would pass on it too. Peace At no point are both feet in the air. Seriously, rewind and look at the next 100 spin moves like this you see. You'll be able to count the legal versions of it on one hand.
just another ref JRutledge wroteLooks like he gathers the ball while both feet are in the air. It is not obvious to me and I would pass on it too. Peace Translation: I don't like travels because the guys on tv don't call them.
just another ref Rich wroteJust kills you, doesn't it? :p I take this as an acknowledgement that I'm right in this case.
Rich just another ref wroteI take this as an acknowledgement that I'm right in this case. I don't care - I didn't even watch the video. I also don't pee into the wind or tilt at windmills.
just another ref Rich wroteI don't care - I didn't even watch the video. I also don't pee into the wind or tilt at windmills. So you now do acknowledge that many obvious travels such as this one are being ignored? And to question this would be to pee into the wind?
Rich just another ref wroteSo you now do acknowledge that many obvious travels such as this one are being ignored? And to question this would be to pee into the wind? I acknowledge nothing. Like I said, I haven't watched the video.
Nevadaref JRutledge wrotePlay #1: It does not look like a BI at all. Play #2: Sorry, but this looks like a charge to me. The player is not airborne at the time of contact and the player looks like he moved laterally. I agree.
Camron Rust Nevadaref wroteI agree. Does the fact that the upper body contact is on the outside of each player's shoulder affect whether you think the defender's lateral movement would be legal?