The Dayton no-call (video)

[Camron Rust]

I agreed with the no call when it happened and upon replay. Defender did jump towards the shooter but landed and stopped before the shooter jumped into him. The shooter should have just shot the ball first and hoped for the foul second instead of playing for the foul by pretending to shoot.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I agreed with the no call when it happened and upon replay. Defender did jump towards the shooter but landed and stopped before the shooter jumped into him. The shooter should have just shot the ball first and hoped for the foul second instead of playing for the foul by pretending to shoot.

I don't think the debate is about B1 spot on the floor because he clearly landed and stayed in that spot. The debate is about the contact with the arms. Was B1 vertical? Was there illegal contact from his right arm? Was A1 responsible for any such contact?

[JRutledge]

I have a no-call here. I felt that way last night and I can live with that when the shooter throws himself into the defender. I also think the defender landed and then basically was vertical. Again the benefit of the doubt in live time is going to the defender in this case.

Peace

[Bad Zebra]

No call when I saw it live and on the replay. Shooter lunges forward to try to manufacture a foul. Defender is slightly less than vertical (on the floor) but did not create the contact. I HATE when similar plays are rewarded with a foul.